The 'Suspend2' project [story] has been renamed to 'TuxOnIce' Nigel Cunningham announced on the lkml, "this is for a couple of reasons: In recent discussions on LKML, the point was made that the word 'Suspend' is confusing. It is used to refer to both suspending to disk and suspending to ram. Life will be simpler if we more clearly differentiate the two. The name Suspend2 came about a couple of years ago when we made the 2.0 release and started self-hosting. If we ever get to a 3.0 release, the name could become even more confusing! (And there are already problems with people confusing the name with swsusp and talking about uswsusp as version 3!)."
Some concern was expressed that this move indicated that the rewritten suspend infrastructure was not being targetted for core inclusion. Nigel explained that this was not the case, "as far as I know, the desire on Rafael's part and mine is still to get at least some of the functionality merged. The only reason this isn't happening yet is that we're both busy with other aspects of the work. Rafael is focussing on infrastructure issues, I'm focussing on minimising the diff and finishing off cleaning up and adding comments to functions." Rafael Wysocki agreed, "my first target is to introduce a framework allowing drivers to have different callbacks for hibernation and suspend. Unfortunately, that turned out to require quite a lot of work - and time - to do."
From: Nigel Cunningham [email blocked] To: LKML [email blocked] Reply-To: nigel Subject: Suspend2 is getting a new name. Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:30:56 +1000 Hi all. Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce". This is for a couple of reasons: In recent discussions on LKML, the point was made that the word "Suspend" is confusing. It is used to refer to both suspending to disk and suspending to ram. Life will be simpler if we more clearly differentiate the two. The name Suspend2 came about a couple of years ago when we made the 2.0 release and started self-hosting. If we ever get to a 3.0 release, the name could become even more confusing! (And there are already problems with people confusing the name with swsusp and talking about uswsusp as version 3!). http://www.suspend2.net is still working at the moment, but we'll shift to http://www.tuxonice.net over the next while. The wiki and bugzilla are already done; email will remain on suspend2.net for a little while and git trees will be renamed at the time of the next stable release. Regards, Nigel -- See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing lists, wiki and bugzilla info.
From: Satyam Sharma [email blocked] Cc: LKML [email blocked] Subject: Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name. Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:53:43 +0530 [ Shamelessly off-topic, but SCNR myself ] On 7/2/07, Nigel Cunningham [email blocked] wrote: > Hi all. > > Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce". Hmm, FunkyMixedCase name ... <tongue-firmly-in-cheek> ... hope this'll make it work on my laptop too :-) [ Is there a prize for posting waaay off-topic messages? ] BTW, TuxOnIce is a better choice for name than some variation of "Hibernate", from a biological perspective too -- as everybody already knows, penguins never quite hibernate, but spend the entire rough Antarctic winter bunched up in a group on the surface (ice) itself ... Satyam
From: Bill Davidsen [email blocked] CC: LKML [email blocked] Subject: Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name. Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:18:39 -0400 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. > > Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce". > > This is for a couple of reasons: > > In recent discussions on LKML, the point was made that the word "Suspend" is > confusing. It is used to refer to both suspending to disk and suspending to > ram. Life will be simpler if we more clearly differentiate the two. > > The name Suspend2 came about a couple of years ago when we made the 2.0 > release and started self-hosting. If we ever get to a 3.0 release, the name > could become even more confusing! (And there are already problems with people > confusing the name with swsusp and talking about uswsusp as version 3!). > > http://www.suspend2.net is still working at the moment, but we'll shift to > http://www.tuxonice.net over the next while. The wiki and bugzilla are > already done; email will remain on suspend2.net for a little while and git > trees will be renamed at the time of the next stable release. > I guess this is "good news, bad news" time. The good news is that the "suspend with working resume" project is still active, the bad news is that making provisions for long term out of mainline operation sounds as if you have no hope of getting this code into the mainline kernel. :-( -- Bill Davidsen [email blocked] "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
From: Nigel Cunningham [email blocked] To: Bill Davidsen [email blocked] Subject: Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name. Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:08:26 +1000 Hi. On Tuesday 03 July 2007 05:18:39 Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I guess this is "good news, bad news" time. The good news is that the > "suspend with working resume" project is still active, the bad news is > that making provisions for long term out of mainline operation sounds as > if you have no hope of getting this code into the mainline kernel. :-( Let's not turn this into a flamewar, please. This is just a name change, nothing more. As far as I know, the desire on Rafael's part and mine is still to get at least some of the functionality merged. The only reason this isn't happening yet is that we're both busy with other aspects of the work. Rafael is focussing on infrastructure issues, I'm focussing on minimising the diff and finishing off cleaning up and adding comments to functions. Regards, Nigel [application/pgp-signature (No public key to verify the signature)] Signature made at Mon 02 Jul 2007 12:08:26 PM HST No public key to verify the signature Key fingerprint: 374CBE9F53379A8D Cannot find user ID for this key.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [email blocked] Subject: Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name. Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:34:05 +0200 Hi, On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 00:08, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > Let's not turn this into a flamewar, please. This is just a name change, > nothing more. > > As far as I know, the desire on Rafael's part and mine is still to get at > least some of the functionality merged. The only reason this isn't happening > yet is that we're both busy with other aspects of the work. Rafael is > focussing on infrastructure issues, I'm focussing on minimising the diff and > finishing off cleaning up and adding comments to functions. That's correct, thanks for saying this! My first target is to introduce a framework allowing drivers to have different callbacks for hibernation and suspend. Unfortunately, that turned out to require quite a lot of work - and time - to do. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
Terrible name. It makes it
Terrible name. It makes it sounds like some stupid game.
It must be really buggy,
It must be really buggy, allways when I am trying to start it, it just turns my computer off. :(
No, but really, although "suspend" is used in different contextes, "TuxOnIce" doesn't say anything at all.
(And btw. I totally dislike this javaish notation ;))
Andreas
What's in a name
I think the name is nicely chosen. I just says it all. Put your tux on ice... freeze your system and unfreeze it when you need it again. I quite like it.
bike shed moment
no, this is not a watershed moment, but a bike shed moment.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING
I have to agree. Stupid name
I have to agree. Stupid name =/
Seriously, why not use more informative names like 'suspend_to_disk' or 'suspend_to_ram'?
Why do people have this love of coming up with ridiculous names for things that rarely tell what exactly the code does?
I thought it was a terrible
I thought it was a terrible name from the main page article, till I saw the email in monospaced font and saw it was TuxOnIce and not TuxOnlce... you win this round arial font!
Name not intuitive
Why not refer to both methods as "SuspendTD" and SuspendTR"?
Any noob not in the know or who never reads Linux related news would not have a clue that TuxOnIce is a power saving feature.
I second the game association.
Reminds me of Penguin Racer.
hoarding before hibernation
I think the underscores and abreviations are no improvement. It could be named hoarding, because that's what animals do before hibernation.
Ditto!
I was thinking to myself "What the heck does ONLCE mean?" Also, I would like to state my distaste for SquishCaps too.
Thanks for pointing that
Thanks for pointing that out. I couldn't understand that it was On Ice, not On 1 ce.
I don't care about the name...
...as long as it works.
> I don't care about name >
> I don't care about name
> ...as long as it works.
tru dat!
Damn straight! As long it
Damn straight!
As long it works well, what does it matter what you name it?
I find the new name
I find the new name excellent.
Catchy names do help people to visualize their meaning.
And a tux frozen on ice is really a good meaning :-)
Terrible name
Wow, that's a terrible name. "suspend2" wasn't exactly brilliant either ("2"... wtf?). As some have already pointed out "TuxOnIce" instinctively sounds like some kind of game (we already have games like TuxRacer, TuxKart, TuxClimber, etc).
In general I'm surprised that so many developers seem to totally underestimate the value of selecting a good name. I'm sure the actual software is great (haven't tried it myself), but bad names like these simply turn people off.
Excuse me, but to someone
Excuse me, but to someone who doesn't use suspend to disk because he doesn't like the name, all I can say is: no sympathy. That must be one of the greatest fools ever.
Then your another prime
Then your another prime example of someone who underestimates the importance of a good name. The point is that unattractive names make people unhappy, unexcited and uninterested. This isn't exactly a rational reaction, but that doesn't matter. Unhappy and unexcited people will in the end contribute less and complain more.
Having no sympathy for issues like this is a terrible marketing strategy for any project. Just look at what happened when OpenBeOS was renamed to WalterOS (another horrible name). I'm sure you know the rest of the story and how they eventually had to rename it Haiku.
That was a joke... they were
That was a joke... they were never actually going to name it WalterOS.
So ...
Is 'TuxOnIce' 'suspend to disk', 'suspend to ram', or 'keep users in suspense'?
If I wasn't told I wouldn't know that it was any kind of suspend system; it sounds like another phrase for "Penguin on Crack".
What next? "Tux_sleeping_with_the_fishes"?
First: Does it work with DRI (direct graphics cards)? Why not?
Second: The name doesn't even come close to helping.
I like it
Who says project names need relevance? Firefox, squid, mutt, apache...
Also Know As
"TOI" for short