Intel Modem on kernel 2.6

Submitted by doctorture
on April 28, 2004 - 4:08pm

Does anybody have a 536EP modem from intel?

They have only release versions of the driver to kernel 2.4 and don't have a schedule to launch an updated version to 2.6.

Anybody have compiled the driver for 2.6 on your own?

Thanks!

I have the same modem, and ha

Anonymous
on
May 10, 2004 - 3:31pm

I have the same modem, and haven't been able to find any drivers for the new kernel lately... I have been hoping someone would make one, or even intel get their act together and make a new one.
Sorry I don't have anything.. I will let you know if i find something.

driver for intel 536ep

Anonymous
on
May 26, 2004 - 4:40pm

Driver will be released in late June 2004(accord. to Intel)

Where this information comes from?

Anonymous
on
May 26, 2004 - 8:51pm

I was in contact with an intel developer who said that theres no date yet.

Ohhh, well... I dont think that is more than 3 men work... :)
Lets get it working, Intel!!!

Thanks!

536ep driver

Anonymous
on
June 3, 2004 - 6:07am

it seems that you are right about intel release dates,anyways few of us are now working on driver for 2.6 kernels.we are trying to modify old driver,in week or so we will have working driver(hopefully).any help is welcomed.

How can I help?

doctorture
on
June 4, 2004 - 11:24pm

How can I contact you? I wanna help!

me too...

Anonymous
on
May 26, 2004 - 10:24am

I am really new to linux.., I just got SuSE 9.1, which has the 2.6 kernel...

I would really wish someone would make one..., I really like SuSE and I hate using XP.., just cause someone wont make a new driver...,

Oh well...

Byan

SuSE 9.1 Up & Running w/External modem

Anonymous
on
June 1, 2004 - 8:08am

I have used two flavors of linux with the 2.6 kernel, and they
both worked flawlessly with my CNet external modem.

This modem should work with all flavors of linux that have the
2.6 kernel . On my system SuSE 9.1 and Mandrake 10.0 work fine.

External CNET modemn driver - Gentoo - 2.6.10

diago (not verified)
on
April 5, 2005 - 1:54am

Hi there

I'm running Gentoo Linux with 2.6.10 and know linux pretty well. However, the dail-up modem thing is new to me. I have a CNET 56k external and have no clue where to find the driver.

Some help here would be great since I'm using XP so much now that I've started to use themes and stuff ... HELP!

diago
PS Please mail me at diago@tuks.co.za since I rarely use kerneltrap. Tx

Any news yet? Or anybody fou

theplaymaker
on
June 19, 2004 - 6:26pm

Any news yet? Or anybody found a driver for the intel 536ep under kernel 2.6.x?

SUSE RPM

Anonymous
on
June 20, 2004 - 11:04am

There is an RPM for SUSE Linux that claims to contain a version of the 536ep driver that will work with a 2.6 kernel. I've tried it with a 2.6.7 kernel. I can get it to compile and insert the kernel module, but if I try to access the modem the computer locks up. Any suggestions?

Contact me via jonathan.rawle.org

intel 536ep working with kernel 2.6 mandrake 10.0 power pack

Anonymous
on
July 30, 2004 - 12:18pm

sorry again because of my english.with driver found on http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/Intel/536/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0tgz
i fine set up my modem ,with kernel 2.6 (mandrake10.0 power pack).dis coment i wrote online with that configuration.

errm can i have it?

Anonymous
on
September 18, 2004 - 9:08am

hi can some one email me the drivers for this to conor.ewings@gmail.com i am desprate to get my linux computer working!

intel 536

Anonymous
on
October 9, 2004 - 12:06pm

please can you send me a driver that you said that work.(mvmilan@yahoo.co.uk)

Any news about it?

Anonymous
on
June 27, 2004 - 9:43am

Does anyone has some new information regaring support for the 536ep modem from Intel to linux 2.6.x ???

Thanks!!

536ep driver

Anonymous
on
June 30, 2004 - 5:37am

I' ve compiled the damm thing,with some minor adjustments in include directives,and some small hacking of source.Driver now compiles but IT DOES'N WORK ,as I suspected.Intel is the only one,who can make a new driver,so complain to Intel!!!

Where can i download?

Anonymous
on
June 30, 2004 - 10:14am

I want to debug if it is possible.

Intel driver support sucks!

compiling 536ep driver for kernel 2.6

Anonymous
on
June 30, 2004 - 12:36pm

you can download driver source from intel,it 's partially open source.after that,try to compile it,follow the errors and modify source.happy hacking :(

PS.As I stated before you can make driver compile without any errors,but it will not work.

Where can I get this version that compiles

Anonymous
on
June 30, 2004 - 5:41pm

I dont know how to make it compile, I just want to get the version that compiles (that one you modified) and try inserting debug code to display the errors.

Intel modems sucks hard on linux.
Intel modems do not work under linux properly.

Where can I get this version that compiles

Anonymous
on
June 30, 2004 - 5:42pm

I dont know how to make it compile, I just want to get the version that compiles (that one you modified) and try inserting debug code to display the errors.

Intel modems sucks hard on linux.
Intel modems do not work under linux properly.
I hope someone will find this on google before buying and Intel modem and buys a USRobotics instead.

driver source

Anonymous
on
July 1, 2004 - 6:25am

I 'm not sure if I still have the hacked source,I'll look it up.there is a message in fedora core 2 mailing list on red hat,about the same thing,look for it there(check in modems section).Guy there also compiled the driver,with same result,and he said there that it is not problem in making the driver to compile,but instead problem is in the part of the driver that intel provides(that part is under intel licence),so until they don't modify that part of the driver to make it compatible with 2.6 kernels,there won't be a new driver.
AND YES, I AGREE,INTEL REALY SUCKS ON LINUX
PS. If you don't know how to make it compile,don't waste your time.
PS. My english is pretty bad,sorry.

intel 536...........hmmmmmmmm!

skrye (not verified)
on
July 28, 2005 - 8:49am

yep, i managed to get that troublesome modem working under
fedora with source aquired from intel, recently ported to Debian
though and am haveing major difficulties with the thing. Like you it compiled but no banana. Still, it will be do-able its just a question of hpw long
'skrye'

536ep linux driver for 2.6 kernels

Anonymous
on
July 10, 2004 - 7:07am

Someone is not telling the truth about the driver.Most of the people claims that changes should be made in a licence closed part of the driver,that intel provides,in order to make modem work on 2.6 series kernels.However intel claims that all changes should be made in open source part of the driver,check this link for more info about the problem,and driver release dates: http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/archive-fourth/msg00914.html
If there is anyone who wants to help in an effort to make new driver,please contact me at dejan_kitic@yahoo.com
I want to try to make changes to an existing driver in order to make it work under 2.6-I need some knowledge about changes made in 2.6,and internal kernel workings.

--Alguien sabe algo nuevo (17Jul2004)??

Anonymous
on
July 19, 2004 - 4:18pm

--does any body have fresh news (17Jul2004)??
--Alguien sabe algo nuevo (17Jul2004)??

Que sucedio con los tipos de Intel?
Pd. Tengo Suse9.1 Kernel 2.6

It works for me

Anonymous
on
August 5, 2004 - 4:46pm

I am using SuSE 9.1 Pro. I went to this page http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/Intel/536/ and at the bottom there is driver source for the 2.6 kernel.

I compiled it without too many problems. You do need kernel-source, gcc and make to be able to compile it though.

It dialed up all right, but I couldn't get an IP address or DNS at first. I set it to 'Stupid Mode' and tried again and it worked perfectly.

I am using it now as I type this message :-)

Shame for intel

Anonymous
on
July 1, 2004 - 5:00am

In Brazil, this modem is very common.
As Intel show its inability to provide quality drivers for it, I am hoping its adotion will diminute a lot.

Yes, as someone said, Intel is not listening to the customers.

Google this!!!

Anonymous
on
July 1, 2004 - 3:50pm

I wish that someone who is going to buy a new modem see this forum and doesnt buy Intel modems.

Thanks!!!

Thanks gentelmen. I was plann

Anonymous
on
July 6, 2004 - 2:14pm

Thanks gentelmen. I was planning to buy this modem but now I will not. What inernal modem I should buy? Is Lucent ok with kernel 2.6? I am using SuSe 9.1 personal free edition.

Nice!!!!

Anonymous
on
July 6, 2004 - 3:40pm

Did you checked out linmodems.org? Dont know if there you will find more information, but anyway...

Modem choice

Anonymous
on
July 7, 2004 - 2:51pm

All internal modems(more-less) are now Win modems,and have or will have some kind of problems with linux(thanks to Micro$oft).It 's better to buy external modem(they are hard Modems).
Linmodems.org is right place to look for info about linux compatible modems.

--Alguien sabe algo nuevo (17Jul2004)??

Anonymous
on
July 19, 2004 - 4:20pm

-does any body have fresh news (17Jul2004)??
--Alguien sabe algo nuevo (17Jul2004)??

Que sucedio con los tipos de Intel?
Pd. Tengo Suse9.1 Kernel 2.6

Just know that Intel Sucks Hard!!!

Anonymous
on
July 19, 2004 - 5:09pm

Intel does not offers support for their products accordingly...

Sad to say that...

536ep with kernel 2.6

Anonymous
on
July 29, 2004 - 4:58am

sorry my english is very buggy.do tray htpp://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/Intel/536/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0.tgz .I didnt tray.

This works on 2.6?

Anonymous
on
July 29, 2004 - 7:55am

I want to put fun back into computing....

I just need to enter the internet again using Linux, as I was
able to do a long, long, time ago, with kernel 2.4...

It is what says in the comment on the site

Anonymous
on
July 29, 2004 - 9:07pm

I will test it now!!!!

I hope it works!!!! :))))) I hope!!!!!
I look forward to it working!!!!!!

I am eager to get back to internet on my linux at home!!!

YES!!! It works!!!!

Anonymous
on
July 30, 2004 - 4:18am

I tried it with success!!! I am writing this now on linux!!!

Do anyone know how made this? Was Intel?
I want to thank this people!!!!

Thanks a lot!!!
Looks like it has a little issues with sound playnd while dialing... It pauses the sound for a second or so, but it works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We now have Intel Modem 536EP working on Linux!!!! Google this!!!

Thanks for the link!!!

Anonymous
on
July 30, 2004 - 4:30am

Yes, it work nicely... Just some simple warnings on compile....

Not a problem, thought.

It just has a few glitches while dialing and listening music. The sound skips a little.

Not a great problem!!!

Hey, guys, it is working!!!!!

YES!!!

Fine if I want 26kbps

Anonymous
on
August 3, 2004 - 4:26am

I'm upset.

I knew this would happen, but stupidly hoped it wouldn't.

The dialling makes funny sounds, that always means for me I end up with a poor carrier speed of about 26400bps, I'm used to 44666bps and so that is just not good enough.

No driver after 4.51 has ever got me a proper connection speed.

I might get 44000 1 in 10 connection attempts:-(

The drivers OUT!

Anonymous
on
July 31, 2004 - 3:37am

For anybody who doesnt know yet, theres a new driver out for the intel 536ep under the 2.6 kernel. Works a charm in Fedora Core 2.
http://linmodems.technion.ac.il/packages/Intel/536/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0...

Enjoy :)
Andrew

what about Fedora Core 3 ?

mhk (not verified)
on
May 8, 2005 - 1:00pm

I could make my modem work on RedHat 9 but i does not work
on Fedora core 3.
what should i do?
need your help....
hisitech@yahoo.com

i had it up and running ion fedora three

skrye (not verified)
on
July 28, 2005 - 9:03am

Hey, Its dead easy

first download the source from intel. Make sure you get source that
hasnt been pre-done for a specific distro just get it bare
make clean
make 536
make install

you've already done the above before no doubt but it didnt work for me
either

in the readme.txt there are further instuctions from the authors of the driver got from no less than linus himself
they are:

0. log in as root.
1. insmod -f Intel536.o (Intel536.ko for kernel 2.6)
2. you can start "hamregistry &" at this point if you wish.
3. rm /dev/536ep
4. mknod /dev/536ep c 240 1 (note "240" is the default, if it does not
work see what /proc/devices says 536ep's major number is)
5. ln -s /dev/536ep /dev/modem
6. start a comm application like minicom and use the modem.

good luck
"skrye"

intel 536EP modem driver for kernel 2.6x on debian?

Anonymous
on
August 6, 2004 - 11:49am

I installed BH6 (=debianbased knoppixlile distro) on hd and I'm very happy with it, but one major problem
I have an e-tech pci56avp hardware fax-modem installed and it doesn't work. ( this is a intel corp. 536EP data fax modem)
Now I found after long search a driver that should work with 2.6x kernels. It's tested under mandrake suse and redhat.
When I try to install the driver, everything goes well untill : make install . here I get errors.
I think I might be something debian-related (boot-up scripts)
here is what went wrong:

root@jackbox1:/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0# make clean
cd coredrv; make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv'
rm -f *.ko *.o *~ core
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv'
rm -f *.o *.ko
root@jackbox1:/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0# make 536
Module precompile check
Current running kernel is: 2.6.6-kanotix-2
/lib/modules... autoconf.h exists
diff: /boot/vmlinuz.autoconf.h: No such file or directory
autoconf.h matches running kernel
diff: /boot/vmlinuz.version.h: No such file or directory
version.h matches running kernel
uname -r|grep "2.6" && \
cd coredrv && make 536core_26 && \
cp Intel536.ko .. && cd .. && \
strip --strip-debug Intel536.ko && \
exit; \
ls Intel536.ko >/dev/null 2>&1 || uname -r | grep "2.6" && echo "Failed to build driver" && exit; \
if [ ]; then \
cd coredrv; make TARGET=TARGET_SELAH KERNEL_SOURCE_PATH= "PSTN_DEF=-DTARGET_SELAH -DTARGET_LINUX -DLINUX" 536core; \
else \
cd coredrv; make TARGET=TARGET_SELAH KERNEL_INCLUDES=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include \
"PSTN_DEF=-DTARGET_SELAH -DTARGET_LINUX -DLINUX" 536core; \
fi ; \
cp Intel536.o .. ; \
if [ -a /boot/vmlinuz.version.h ]; then \
cp /boot/vmlinuz.version.h /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include/linux/version.h;\
fi
2.6.6-kanotix-2
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv'
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.6-kanotix-2/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv modules
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.6-kanotix-2'
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.o
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c:756: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c:757: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c: In function `dspdrv_CommRamISR':
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c:879: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c: At top level:
/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/coredrv.c:286: warning: `power_callback' defined but not used
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/clmmain.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/rts.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/task.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/uart.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/wwh_dflt.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/locks.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/softserial_io.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/softserial_ioctl.o
CC [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/softserial.o
LD [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/Intel536.o
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
CC /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/Intel536.mod.o
LD [M] /usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv/Intel536.ko
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.6-kanotix-2'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0/coredrv'
root@jackbox1:/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0# make install
rm -f /etc/hamregistry.bin
bash Intel536_inst
running kernel 2.6.6-kanotix-2
installing hamregistry, used for persistant storage
installing Intel536 driver
unknown distribution. no boot scripts installed
make: *** [install] Error 1
root@jackbox1:/usr/local/modem-driver/intel-536EP-2.56.76.0#

Has anybody got this driver installed succesfuly on a debian based distro or does somebody know how to make "make install " work?

YES.

Anonymous
on
August 26, 2004 - 5:59pm

Yes, I have done, a long time ago on a Debian Woody.
if you see, your autoconf.h and others files dont run fine.. thats is becouse you dont have the correct dir or the install script dont have a nice link to your kernel source. See your driver script file and search the line that runs the verif.. the autoconf.h exist. See the correct list of directories that they wants, and also check if you have it (autoconf.h) in your linux, in fact.... for example they wants:
/usr/share/kernel/linux/includes
but in your linux you have:
/user/share/kernel/intel2.6/includes..

you only need do a new link ln -s to '.../linux/...' and check,
that helps to me a lot of times.. See you.

sorry for my stupid english,
its no my first lenguaje.
its hard to me.

Mario.

I changed distros last week,

skrye_ (not verified)
on
July 30, 2005 - 8:23pm

I changed distros last week, now using Debian with a 2.4 kernel
and lo and behold the only bit of hardware giving me trouble is the very same modem (536ep). I've actually partitioned a few gigs of space to run windows NT which, regretfully im using to write this.

This is what i've done so far

got the source from intel, followed the usual, make clean....etc etc
no go so i followed the extra advice:

if the driver compiles but the script just wont work for you.
Here are the bare minimum steps to get your modem to work.

0. log in as root.
1. insmod -f Intel536.o (Intel536.ko for kernel 2.6)
2. you can start "hamregistry &" at this point if you wish.
3. rm /dev/536ep
4. mknod /dev/536ep c 240 1 (note "240" is the default, if it does not
work see what /proc/devices says 536ep's major number is)
5. ln -s /dev/536ep /dev/modem
6. start a comm application like minicom and use the modem.

On following step 1` i got :

you are tying to insert a non GPL module into the kernel, contact the company only they can help you.

or somthing like that.

so i looked for another way
on anothers advice i modified the intel source. In the coredrv/coredrv.c file and the serialdrv/softserial.c file, there is the line:

MODULE_LICENSE("Proprietary");

i changed these two lines (for the purpose of learning only) to:

MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

however it returned to me:

unresolved symbol put_tty_driver.

I've found the offending bit of code but cant figure out how to fix it, any help or an easier way would be very greatly recived.

Damien. "skrye"

ps: altering proprietary code affects your right to use it :-P

lo

rmilun (not verified)
on
April 16, 2005 - 4:55pm

exactly the same problem,on ubuntu...dunno what should i do...i even get 100% same message as you :)

same here

Sancho (not verified)
on
April 18, 2005 - 7:15pm

ever find an answer for ubuntu?

I'm getting the exact same er

Sancho (not verified)
on
April 18, 2005 - 7:14pm

I'm getting the exact same error as you on ubuntu as well. If any of you find an answer. Please, PLEASE post it.

Modified Intel's 536EP sources

Philippe (not verified)
on
July 13, 2005 - 1:28pm

Hi,

I modified Intel's 536EP sources to make it work on Fedora Core 4. It appears to work fine as I can use efax to send faxes. However I still have a problem with efix getting a blank page when $ efix -n letter letter.txt. If someone has a clue for it, I would be pretty glad.
Philippe (mailto:Philippe.Vouters@laposte.net)

Driver source

Dejan Kitic (not verified)
on
July 23, 2005 - 1:27am

I also modified driver source to compile,and it loads fine but modem is not responding,can u post your source,maybe i can help with efix,u can email me to dejan_kitic@yahoo.com

intel 536ep

ionel (not verified)
on
July 24, 2005 - 11:16pm

Please, tell me how did you get working this modem?
can you be more sppecifically?

10x a lot
ionel

Hi Ionel, Can you email me

Philippe (not verified)
on
July 27, 2005 - 12:42pm

Hi Ionel,

Can you email me so that I can send you the .tgz. I tested it with efax and I can CTRL-C right in the middle of sending data. Note that I also modified efix so that it does not display a blank window on xloadimage (aka fax view).
Here is what I obtain on a CTRL-C:
[root@victor intel-536EP-2.56.76.0]# efax -t
~philippe/Ma
efax: Sun Jul 24 17:00:18 2005 efax v 0.9 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas
efax: Sun Jul 24 17:00:18 2005 efax v 0.9 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas
efax: 00:18 compiled Jul 24 2005 15:23:23
efax: 00:19 opened /dev/modem
efax: 00:21 using 536EP in class 1
efax: 00:21 dialing
efax: 00:58 connected
efax: 00:59 Warning: bit-reversed HDLC frame, reversing bit order
efax: 00:59 received NSF - answering features
efax: 01:00 received CSI - answering ID
efax: 01:00 remote ID ->
efax: 01:00 received DIS - answering capabilities
efax: 01:00 remote has no document(s) to send, and can receive
efax: 01:00 local 196lpi 14.4kbps 8.5"/215mm any 1D - - 0ms
efax: 01:00 remote 196lpi 9600bps 8.5"/215mm any 1D - -
20/10ms
efax: 01:00 session 196lpi 9600bps 8.5"/215mm any 1D - -
10ms
efax: 01:00 sent TSI - caller ID
efax: 01:02 sent DCS - session format
efax: 01:05 sent TCF - channel check of 1800 bytes
efax: 01:06 received CFR - channel OK
efax: 01:06 header:[Sun Jul 24 17:00:18 2005 P.
1]
efax: 01:07 Error: terminating on signal 2
efax: 01:07 failed -> /home/philippe/Ma
efax: 01:13 sync: dropping DTR
efax: 01:18 done, returning 5 (terminated by signal)
[root@victor intel-536EP-2.56.76.0]#

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.