Dear all
i have compiled kernel 2.4.20 with Andrew Morton low-lentency-patch.
i did tcp benchmarking with tbench but i am getting very low tcp throught as compare to stock kernel
108 Mbit/Sec Average ( Redhat Stock kernel 2.4.20)
143 Mbit/Sec Avarage ( Kernel 2.4.20 with low-lentency-patch )
any idea how to get maxium tcp performance from box
Thanks
Talha
TCP
I would suggest you to try out vanilla 2.4.23 kernel. Myself, I have no problem squeezing the maximum tcp performance from my fileserv (Running 2.6.0-test11) and router (Running 2.4.23).
And if you still have problems with tcp performance, you could try to search the lkml (Sorry, it may be finnish, just replace .fi with .com if it is) about posts of it.
Good luck.
--
Regards,
Markus Hästbacka
I will try that
Thanks for your reply . will try that
Do you like to share that parameter you use for tcp tunning
which linux kernel is hotest these days for performance
i just want performance hungray machine . which i will use on for my cache servers
Thanks
Talha
re: I will try that
I've not made anykind of tuning for my TCP performance, really.
It was great from the beginning I installed Linux.
My problems have mostly been that the disk is slower than the network.
I think the 2.6 series is best for network performance, but it may be unstable on some systems. If you are intrested in upgrading to 2.6 you may want to read the howto.
I noticed my bad disk performance when I installed a new 120Gb disk on my server. (It was a Pentium 133MHz back then)
I could only move 2-3Mb/s, now I can move 13-15Mb/sec over nfs/smbfs.
So I think you could check if your disks are any faster than the network. If not, then that might be the problem.
Just a suggestion.
Good luck for finding the problem.
--
Regards,
Markus
i have 3 SCSI disk which i th
i have 3 SCSI disk which i think is performance ok check through iostat command
yes i 2.6 many good features i will definitly try that
Thanks for your help
Regards
Talha