"ez430-rf2500 driver problems" kerneltrap.org/node/15941
Reminded me some old stuff:
* TI TUSB3410 chip is too universal for linux USB core,
this core might have a design flaw, developers don't agree;
(some time latter ez430-rf2500 uses chip in the different way)
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/50296
(see also flame in thread)
* i don't like Greg:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.devel/51278
_____
Those buzz words
Linux as world domination for somebody as much better, than sharing code and ideas. I don't like Greg. Linux supports more different types of devices than any other operating system ever has in the history of computing. "A Linux Driver Project status report" http://lwn.net/Articles/276973/ Yea, just like The future of Linux: what it means for Wikipedia (apc) http://lwn.net/Articles/267338/ #comments: "The comparison to wikipedia seems seriously flawed to me." Seconded! Better get help to kernel hackers with smart and non sucking userspace! Yea, i'm frenzy, and maybe i just am crazy. ______Re: I AM, dammit!
Reply to this statement about me being troll.
If you would read/scrolled topics of this blog (just to be familiar with named user of this site), you would know, that i'm fed up with shiny new kernel crap all around.
And you would know, i'm a troll.
And would not feed me!
BTW, first answer was about trivial userspace binary patching by open(), seek(), write(), which cannot be done by system tools. IMHO this tools must be developed/fixed by same kernel developers, because it's trivial self test, every programmer should do, especially kernel one.
Second answer was a reply to what i'm talking about. Then was you, feeding me -- troll.
Cheers.
____