Re: [Tux3] Dirty hack blockread() and dleaf_merge() fix

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...>
Cc: <tux3@...>
Date: Monday, December 29, 2008 - 1:52 am

Daniel Phillips writes:

>> Second one is dleaf_merge() fix. Now, it don't care about

Actually, copying group/entry/extent are your original version. Those
are just tweaked for new local values.

I modified code to keep vfrom leaf valid.

static-http://userweb.kernel.org/~hirofumi/tux3/

Please review and pull it again.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3@tux3.org
http://mailman.tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Tux3] More xattr design details, Benjamin K. Stuhl, (Wed Sep 10, 9:23 pm)
[Tux3] Dirty hack blockread() and dleaf_merge() fix, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Sun Dec 28, 11:46 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Dirty hack blockread() and dleaf_merge() fix, Daniel Phillips, (Mon Dec 29, 12:13 am)
Re: [Tux3] Dirty hack blockread() and dleaf_merge() fix, OGAWA Hirofumi, (Mon Dec 29, 1:52 am)
Re: [Tux3] More xattr design details, Daniel Phillips, (Wed Sep 10, 10:15 pm)
Re: [Tux3] More xattr design details, Daniel Phillips, (Thu Sep 11, 6:04 pm)