Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <tux3@...>
Cc: Maciej <zenczykowski@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 - 4:02 pm

On Tuesday 11 November 2008 10:29, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:

Nothing prevents the file data and inode of an unlinked file from being
written to disk. The file just has to exist at delta transition time,
linked or not. If unlinked, the file is an orphan, which has to be
handled in any case.

Regards,

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
Tux3@tux3.org
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Matthew Dillon, (Fri Jul 25, 10:02 pm)
[Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Daniel Phillips, (Mon Nov 10, 6:20 am)
[Tux3] Grasping Tux3 concepts as an FS newbie reading recomm..., Kadianakis George, (Wed Oct 14, 7:29 pm)
[Tux3] help..., nandan yen, (Mon Nov 16, 1:18 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Maciej Żenczykowski, (Mon Nov 10, 5:56 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Daniel Phillips, (Tue Nov 11, 3:15 am)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Maciej Żenczykowski, (Tue Nov 11, 3:50 am)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Daniel Phillips, (Tue Nov 11, 5:13 am)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Maciej Żenczykowski, (Tue Nov 11, 2:29 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Deferred Namespace Operations, Daniel Phillips, (Tue Nov 11, 4:02 pm)
Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design, Daniel Phillips, (Sun Jul 27, 7:51 am)