Found 122 matching messages (0.041 seconds). Page 1 of 7.
... 17:41:34 2008 +0200
>
> x86: 4kstacks default
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar
linux-kernel - Andrew Morton - Apr 18 2008 - 17:29
... akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > >>> config 4KSTACKS >>> bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks ... depends on DEBUG_KERNEL >>> depends on X86_32 >>> + default y >> This patch will cause ... distros use 4K stacks on x86, really? -Eric [1] http://www. ...
linux-kernel - Eric Sandeen - Apr 19 2008 - 23:29
...
linux-kernel - Arjan van de Ven - Apr 23 2008 - 20:45
... @linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > config 4KSTACKS > > > > bool "Use 4Kb for kernel ... on DEBUG_KERNEL > > > > depends on X86_32 > > > > + default y > > > > > > This patch will cause ... solve them, because even on x86-64 with 8k stacks they ...
linux-kernel - Arjan van de Ven - Apr 19 2008 - 14:00
...
linux-kernel - Ingo Molnar - Apr 19 2008 - 14:33
... Commit: d61ecf0b53131564949bc4196e70f676000a845a
>> Author: Ingo Molnar
linux-kernel - Bodo Eggert - Apr 19 2008 - 06:56
...
linux-kernel - Ingo Molnar - Apr 19 2008 - 10:23
... @linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > config 4KSTACKS > > > bool "Use 4Kb for kernel ... on DEBUG_KERNEL > > > depends on X86_32 > > > + default y > > > > This patch will cause ... stacks. So basically the kernel default just follows the > common distro ...
linux-kernel - Oliver Pinter - Apr 19 2008 - 10:35
... akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > config 4KSTACKS > > > bool "Use 4Kb for kernel ... on DEBUG_KERNEL > > > depends on X86_32 > > > + default y > > > > This patch will cause ... default now. (distros and users can still disable it) Do we ...
linux-kernel - Benjamin Herrenschmidt - Apr 23 2008 - 01:27
... Morton
linux-kernel - David Chinner - Apr 23 2008 - 19:36
... Andrew Morton
linux-kernel - Shawn Bohrer - Apr 19 2008 - 10:59
... akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > config 4KSTACKS > > > bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks ... on DEBUG_KERNEL > > > depends on X86_32 > > > + default y > > > > This patch will cause ... stacks. I doubt if you're testing things like nfsd-on- ...
linux-kernel - Andrew Morton - Apr 19 2008 - 13:49
... Morton
linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Apr 20 2008 - 04:09
...
linux-kernel - Parag Warudkar - Apr 25 2008 - 13:39
... 't test. > > Which you won't fix by changing the x86 defaults. Stuff like nfsd, xfs and raid is covered by the x86 defaults. It's not a 100% coverage, but quite much. > More of a problem in > embedded small ...
linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Apr 20 2008 - 07:54
... note we're talking about an x86 default option here) >> >> Also ... side so much that you're pretty much outside >> the "validated ... now there are very little x86 SOCs if any (iirc there ... just object to changing the default options on important architectures to ...
linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Apr 20 2008 - 14:19
... but I don't think they're x86 embedded people. Right now there > are very little x86 SOCs if any (iirc there is ... just object to changing the > default options on important architectures to ... 4k stacks should become the default I prefer not touching with ...
linux-kernel - Jörn - Apr 20 2008 - 16:35
... then solve them, because even on x86-64 with 8k stacks > > they ... overflows on x86_64, or on x86. We see them regularly enough ... it's very common on x86. I don't have a ... compared to 4k stacks on x86.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal ...
linux-kernel - David Chinner - Apr 20 2008 - 18:53
... Andi Kleen
linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Apr 20 2008 - 08:36
... are SoC systems. Do they really run x86? (note we're talking about an x86 default option here) Also I suspect in a true 16MB ... down everything kernel side so much that you're pretty much outside the "validated by testers" realm ...
linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Apr 20 2008 - 13:19