Found 16 matching messages (0.108 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
... time with "echo 0 > > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > > > > > maxcpus=1 ... that much performance difference. > > > > > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would ... EIDA. > That benefit, however, is subject to this bug: > http://bugzilla. ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 26 2008 - 03:26
... time with "echo 0 > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > > > maxcpus=1 should ... for that much performance difference. > > > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would make ... aka EIDA. That benefit, however, is subject to this bug: http://bugzilla. ...
linux-kernel - Len Brown - Mar 25 2008 - 19:27
... with "echo 0 > > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > > > > > maxcpus=1 ... that much performance difference. > > > > > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would ... which likely makes a large > difference. > > > But it should > > > be actually ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 25 2008 - 13:56
... Meyer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual > core > ... time with "echo 0 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > maxcpus=1 ... that much performance difference. > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 25 2008 - 13:23
... time with "echo 0 > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > > > maxcpus=1 should ... that much performance difference. > > > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would ... which likely makes a large difference. > > But it should > > be actually ...
linux-kernel - Wander Winkelhorst - Mar 25 2008 - 13:49
... Meyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > > ... time with "echo 0 > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > maxcpus=1 should ... for that much performance difference. If he used maxcpus=0 it would make ...
linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Mar 25 2008 - 13:16
... Meyer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > ... time with "echo 0 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > > > > maxcpus=1 ... for that much performance difference. > > If he used maxcpus=0 it would ...
linux-kernel - Pavel Machek - Mar 28 2008 - 10:00
... 50, Michael Meyer wrote: > Hi, > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating ... activated. But with the second core > deactivated using "echo 0 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" ...
linux-kernel - Pavel Machek - Mar 28 2008 - 09:59
... :50, Michael Meyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by ... activated. But with the second core > > deactivated using "echo 0 > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 29 2008 - 16:55
... is the difference between booting a dual core > > > machine with "maxcpus=1" ... : core stays powered off > > 0 > online : core enters halt. > > > > > I observed a ... with the second core > > > deactivated using "echo 0 > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1 ...
linux-kernel - Pavel Machek - Mar 29 2008 - 17:22
... pavel@ucw.cz> schrieb: > Hi! > > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > > > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by ... . But with the second core > > > > deactivated using "echo 0 > > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 29 2008 - 18:16
... Michael Meyer wrote: > Hi,=20 >=20 > what is the difference between booting a dual core > machine with "maxcpus= ... > core at run time with "echo 0 > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? maxcpus=3D1 should turn off the SMP alternative and switch to ...
linux-kernel - Luciano Rocha - Mar 25 2008 - 10:08
... +0100, Michael > Meyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what is the difference between booting a dual core > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating ... > second > > core at run time with "echo 0 > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"? > ...
linux-kernel - Michael Meyer - Mar 25 2008 - 12:38
... to get the exact same behaviour of > "maxcpus=1" with disabling the second core only I ... , but I do remember some java performance problems on Multi-Core with some Dell ... . I just felt reminded, because MAXCPU=1 helped back then, also. Gruss Bernd y ...
linux-kernel - Bernd Eckenfels - Mar 29 2008 - 19:22
> What kind of CPU are you using? Some Intel CPU's do "funny stuff", > like dynamically overclocking itself when working on a single thread, > or using all of the 2nd level cache instead of sharing it with the > second core. P0 should also work fine
linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Mar 25 2008 - 13:57
Hi! > > Ok, and your chip is too old to have "Enhanced Dynamic Acceleration > > Technology" (Intel, can't you use some reasonable names?!)... both > > would explain effects you see, and it is neither... > > It is too old to have that. I bought it
linux-kernel - Pavel Machek - Apr 2 2008 - 07:31
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki | Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 |
| Aubrey | O_DIRECT question |
git: | |
| Andy Parkins | Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: Notes on Using Git with Subprojects |
| Junio C Hamano | [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins |
| Andrew Ruder | [PATCH] Add policy on user-interface changes |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marcos Laufer | dmesg IBM x3650 OpenBSD 4.3 |
| Woodchuck | Re: bcw(4) is gone |
| Renaud Allard | Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| john ye | [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq network code on SMP |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 04/15]: act_api: use nlmsg_parse |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
