... Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > # > > # slub && antifrag > > # > > have-kswapd-keep-a-minimum- ... -to-increase-allocation-order.patch > > slub-reduce-antifrag-max-order.patch > > > > I ... patches being pulled but it was simply on the grounds that ...

linux-kernel - Mel Gorman - Oct 2 2007 - 14:38

... Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > # > > # slub && antifrag > > # > > have-kswapd-keep-a-minimum-order ... to-increase-allocation-order.patch > > slub-reduce-antifrag-max-order.patch > > > > I ... -mm than mainline, and it was > here that they went bad. ...

linux-kernel - Nick Piggin - Oct 2 2007 - 05:10

... wrote: > The maximum order of allocation used by SLUB may have ... system since small systems (128M was the > case that Peter found) ... Lameter --- mm/slub.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, ...

linux-kernel - Christoph Lameter - Oct 2 2007 - 20:37

... can still use the higher orders if configured to > do so ... effort. The maximum order of allocation used by SLUB may have ... system since small systems (128M was the case that Peter found ... has similar measures to avoid order 1 allocations for small systems ...

linux-kernel - Christoph Lameter - Oct 2 2007 - 14:28