... state of Linux with regard to > _really_ forcing a filesystem to unmount. > > There is a ... 1) is already supported with lazy umount (umount -l) for 2), it's not ... there. Just it's not called "forced umount"..... - To unsubscribe from this list: ...

linux-fsdevel - Arjan van de Ven - Mar 18 2007 - 15:16

... state of Linux with regard to > > _really_ forcing a filesystem to unmount. > > > > There is a ... > 1) is already supported with lazy umount (umount -l) > for 2), it's not ... s there. Just it's not > called "forced umount"..... I'd be interested to know ...

linux-fsdevel - Mike Snitzer - Mar 18 2007 - 16:20

... of Linux with regard to > > _really_ forcing a filesystem to unmount. > > > > There is ... people who say they want forced umount is.. that > most of ... ) is already supported with lazy umount (umount -l) > for 2), it's not forced umount that they want, it' ...

linux-fsdevel - Pozsar Balazs - Mar 26 2007 - 07:21

... state of Linux with regard to >_really_ forcing a filesystem to unmount. > >There is a ... of Linux while doing so. > >Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the ... ? Having been 'caught out' on this subject more than a few times, usually ...

linux-fsdevel - Gene Heskett - Mar 17 2007 - 01:24

... 16/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater ... for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs) patches: http://lwn.net/Articles/ ...

linux-fsdevel - Mike Snitzer - Mar 17 2007 - 01:37

Mike Snitzer wrote: > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater > Linux community? Is anyone actively working on this? Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml ...

linux-fsdevel - Jeremy Fitzhardinge - Mar 17 2007 - 00:27

... 2007 at 08:16:19PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > the problem with the people who say they want forced umount is.. that > most of the time they either want > 1) get rid of the namespace entry > or > 2 ...

linux-fsdevel - Matthew Wilcox - Mar 18 2007 - 16:13

... for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs) > patches: > http://lwn.net/Articles/ ... follow the badfs-style approach of the forced unmount patches. However, there are some problems with the forced unmount patches that are now fixed in the ...

linux-fsdevel - Pekka Enberg - Mar 17 2007 - 06:53

... whole? I thought it was just to force specific files closed, not the whole filesystem. ... follow the > badfs-style approach of the forced unmount patches. However, there are > some problems with the forced unmount patches that are now fixed in > the ...

linux-fsdevel - Phillip Susi - Mar 26 2007 - 17:34

... for the filesystem as a whole? I thought it > was just to force specific files closed, not the whole filesystem. What if > the ... we declare the inode revoked. But, I haven't looked at forced unmount that much so there may be other issues I am not ...

linux-fsdevel - Pekka J Enberg - Mar 27 2007 - 02:32

... > declare the inode revoked. > > But, I haven't looked at forced unmount that much so there may be other > issues I am ... purposes of this thread we _do_ want to abort pending updates to force the system to give up on a broken block device rather than ...

linux-fsdevel - Phillip Susi - Mar 28 2007 - 10:46

On Mar 18 2007 14:13, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >Equally, if one has one's ogg collection stored on said NFS server, the >ogg player will be in uninterruptible sleep while holding the sound device >open, preventing other applications from making

linux-fsdevel - Jan Engelhardt - Mar 18 2007 - 19:45