... in considering the >>>>>>> stability of ZFS is whether or not Sun ... didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :) >>>>> >>>>> [Citation needed] >>>> >>>> I can't ... taste in my mouth about ZFS in general. Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd ...

freebsd-current - Scott Long - Jan 6 2008 - 17:54

... rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :) >>>> >>>> [Citation needed] >>> >>> I can't provide ... feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is >>> larger than that ... tells me that administrators considering ZFS should > expect to spend a fair ...

freebsd-current - Kris Kennaway - Jan 6 2008 - 17:32

... said that the > only problem that ZFS has is with memory. +++ > Unfortunately, ... - more graceful degradation & recovery. Whatever. ZFS-specific, not BSD-in-general. > ... on this list in re still-experimental-at-best ZFS is distracting attention ...

freebsd-current - 韓家標 Bill Hacker - Jan 6 2008 - 18:20

... might never even have 'invented' ZFS. > Could you by any chance ... not get an impression that ZFS is the cluster-aware filesystem ... principle architect/miracle worker of ZFS on FreeBSD - pjd@ - seems to ... for production use w/r ZFS - perhaps until 8.X. Bill ...

freebsd-current - 韓家標 Bill Hacker - Jan 6 2008 - 22:29

... - the principle architect/miracle worker of ZFS on FreeBSD - pjd@ - > seems to be ... NULL, file: /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/ ... t recover my zpool. I had choose zfs because the fantastic features available, instant ...

freebsd-current - Alexandre Biancalana - Jan 7 2008 - 11:23

... this list in re >> still-experimental-at-best ZFS is distracting ... It almost begs dismissal of ZFS posts to the bespoke list ... results. > None are perfect. But ZFS is just *too* new. And ... might never even have 'invented' ZFS. The 'other' ones with the ...

freebsd-current - 韓家標 Bill Hacker - Jan 6 2008 - 18:58

... bad taste in > my mouth about ZFS in general. > > Scott To be fair ... we don't need. We're chasing promises... I'd happily trade ... to' actually resides - not on ZFS or GPFS. Bill _______________________________________________ freebsd- ...

freebsd-current - 韓家標 Bill Hacker - Jan 6 2008 - 18:32

... , but the level of 'traffic' on this list in re=20 > still-experimental-at-best ZFS is distracting attention from issues tha= t=20 > ... Soon Now'. >=20 > It almost begs dismissal of ZFS posts to the bespoke list out-of-hand. >=20 ...

freebsd-current - Ivan Voras - Jan 6 2008 - 18:43

... Hacker wrote: > None are perfect. But ZFS is just *too* new. And not just on ... GPFS, Sun might never even have 'invented' ZFS. Could you by any chance elaborate -- from ... , I did not get an impression that ZFS is the cluster-aware filesystem or will ...

freebsd-current - Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko - Jan 6 2008 - 20:03

... wrote: > I guess what makes me mad about ZFS is that it's all-or-nothing; either > it works, or it ... not so great, and it leaves a bad taste in > my mouth about ZFS in general. I agree with the sentiment. I don't know about its ...

freebsd-current - Ivan Voras - Jan 6 2008 - 18:33

... better. > However, OP's point was that ZFS has inherent cluster abilities, of > which I ... . Indeed, but I do remember hearing the Lustre/ZFS rumors. Drew _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list ...

freebsd-current - Andrew Gallatin - Jan 9 2008 - 11:36

... GPFS 3.1 over iSCSI and so far was fairly pleased with that. However, OP's point was that ZFS has inherent cluster abilities, of which I have found no information whatsoever. > > Drew > _______________________________________________ > freebsd ...

freebsd-current - Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko - Jan 9 2008 - 10:55

Ivan Voras wrote: > guessing here: maybe the problem is in M_NOWAIT - maybe there could be Um, I don't think this part of the post means what I wanted it to mean - = please ignore it - ETOOTIRED :)

freebsd-current - Ivan Voras - Jan 6 2008 - 21:16

=?UTF-8?B?6Z+T5a625qiZIEJpbGwgSGFja2Vy?= writes: > > OTOH that's all GPFS is. > > Far more features than that - 'robust', 'fault tolerant', 'Disaster Recovery' > ... all the usual buzzwords. > > And nothing prevents using 'cluster' tools

freebsd-current - Andrew Gallatin - Jan 9 2008 - 09:23