login
Header Space

 
 

Mailing list archives

Search results

Found 50 matching messages (0.148 seconds). Page 1 of 3.

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On 2008-02-07 06:18, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Just curious: what ... in any > :detail in your past HAMMER update mails, but please point me to the mail if > :it was. ... get a reasonable fill ratio before HAMMER would have > to allocate another cluster ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Erik Wikström - Feb 7 2008 - 15:38

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:22:58PM -0800, Matthew Dillon ... it is. A real beta-state hammer > :justifies a 2.0 release on ... will let Matt work on > :hammer without any tight deadlines. > : > :Aggelos ... poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Joe Talbott - Feb 9 2008 - 15:41

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

1.12 On Feb 9, 2008 11:51 PM, Robert r3tex ... it is. A real beta-state hammer > > :justifies a 2.0 release on ... will let Matt work on > > :hammer without any tight deadlines. > > : > > :Aggelos > ... poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for > ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Maslan - Feb 9 2008 - 21:34

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Matthew Dillon wrote: [...] > * I can't fix the ... 't think it was described in any detail in your past HAMMER update mails, but please point me ... . As long as I'm asking HAMMER-related questions... This may be obvious ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Aggelos Economopoulos - Feb 6 2008 - 22:26

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... 't think it was described in any :detail in your past HAMMER update mails, but please point me ... get a reasonable fill ratio before HAMMER would have to allocate another cluster ... As long as I'm asking HAMMER-related questions... This may be obvious ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Matthew Dillon - Feb 7 2008 - 01:18

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Fri, February 8, 2008 7:22 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > ... to poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for > ... to match the major revision, and HAMMER seems to be that thing. ... bugs or stability issues; people (ahem) hammering on it is the best ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Justin C. Sherrill - Feb 8 2008 - 23:22

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... it with a pre-alpha > :hammer is a waste of an ... is. A real beta-state hammer > :justifies a 2.0 release ... will let Matt work on > :hammer without any tight deadlines. > : > :Aggelos ... com> Neither. 1.2X wherein HAMMER fs is 'experimental' - With an ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Bill Hacker - Feb 9 2008 - 01:13

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Thursday 07 February 2008, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > he, > > * Matthew Dillon wrote: > ... weeks and have a bit more stable HAMMER instead. There's always the option of ... , this will let Matt work on hammer without any tight deadlines. Aggelos

dragonflybsd-kernel - Aggelos Economopoulos - Feb 7 2008 - 15:44

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... shipping it with a pre-alpha :hammer is a waste of an opportunity ... is. A real beta-state hammer :justifies a 2.0 release ... will let Matt work on :hammer without any tight deadlines. : :Aggelos ... poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Matthew Dillon - Feb 8 2008 - 20:22

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... shipping it with a pre-alpha > :hammer is a waste of an ... it is. A real beta-state hammer > :justifies a 2.0 release ... will let Matt work on > :hammer without any tight deadlines. > : > :Aggelos > ... poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - walt - Feb 8 2008 - 21:42

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... shipping it with a pre-alpha > :hammer is a waste of an ... it is. A real beta-state hammer > :justifies a 2.0 release ... will let Matt work on > :hammer without any tight deadlines. > : > :Aggelos > ... poll the people on kernel@. HAMMER won't be ready for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Robert "r3tex" Luciani - Feb 9 2008 - 19:51

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... stage to boot DragonFly kernel off a hammer > filesystem ? Maybe it would be a good idea to include UFS/HAMMER option in > the installer. > > Petr I'd ... ), are read-mostly-write-seldom creatures. HAMMER fs, or any other 'feature rich' fs ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Bill Hacker - Feb 11 2008 - 03:53

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... boot DragonFly kernel off a hammer :filesystem ? Maybe it would be a good idea to include UFS/HAMMER option in :the installer. : :Petr ... No, not yet. Though HAMMER does reserve space to store boot ... know how to search a HAMMER filesystem and won't for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Matthew Dillon - Feb 11 2008 - 11:31

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... No, not yet. Though HAMMER does reserve space to store boot ... know how to search a HAMMER filesystem and won't for ... will it be in production HAMMER to expand/shrink filesystems: ie. ... for /usr. 2) Is production HAMMER going to contain support for ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Petr Janda - Feb 11 2008 - 20:12

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... how easy will it :be in production HAMMER to expand/shrink filesystems: ie. /home ... on a whim. :2) Is production HAMMER going to contain support for Extended ... is absolutely nothing preventing it. Since HAMMER uses a record-based storage model, ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Matthew Dillon - Feb 11 2008 - 21:48

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Sun, February 10, 2008 4:00 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Ok, it' ... point calling it 2.0 without a production-ready HAMMER. > > Considering how few items are left on the list for HAMMER, it will > likely be production-ready long before the ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Justin C. Sherrill - Feb 10 2008 - 17:33

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... a limited number of virtualized FIFOs can all be atomically updated in a single write of the volume header. We have plenty of bits in the 64 bit hammer offset to abstract out both named blocks and virtualized fifos. ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Matthew Dillon - Feb 7 2008 - 15:58

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

On Thursday 07 February 2008, Erik Wikström wrote: > On 2008-02-07 06:18, Matthew Dillon wrote: [...] > > :As long as I'm asking HAMMER-related questions... This may be obvious from the > > :code but I haven't looked ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Aggelos Economopoulos - Feb 7 2008 - 16:07

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

... which isn't quite ready yet. And then release 2.0 with HAMMER known to be good, solid, and well-tested. If you're going to make a big deal about HAMMER, then it would be doubly-plus-good to be confident that all the ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Garance A Drosihn - Feb 9 2008 - 23:08

Re: HAMMER update 06-Feb-2008

Make this a 1.12, because HAMMER is only in an alpha state. Then when HAMMER is production ready release, change the numbering scheme altogether. The roman numerals for example are nice, and would ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Petr Janda - Feb 9 2008 - 23:17

speck-geostationary