... I just snagged the kernel patch (linux-0.97-patch1) from banjo and |> applied it (patch -p0 < linux-0.97-patch1) successfully ... class |> make: *** [tools/build] Error 1 |> |> I have previously compiled the ... That is because 0.97 patch 1 is intended for gcc ...

linux-activists - Hongjiu Lu - Aug 7 1992 - 20:32

hlu@phys1.physics.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu) writes: >That is because 0.97 patch 1 is intended for gcc 2.2.2d. ... to release >it to public this weekend. That's wierd; I just applied patch 1 and had no problem whatsoever compiling with ...

linux-activists - Tim Russell - Aug 7 1992 - 23:20

... 1992Aug8.003213.24522@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@phys1.physics.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu) writes: >That is because 0.97 patch 1 is intended for gcc 2.2.2d. I will try to release >it to public this weekend. > >-- ...

linux-activists - Eric Youngdale - Aug 8 1992 - 17:11

Don't apply the patch I just put on sunsite. It has some serious things wrong with it. I will be putting a new version out tomorrow, as soon as sunsite it back up. Corey wf-rch.cirr.com

linux-activists - Corey Minyard - Jan 22 1993 - 06:06

... @phys1.physics.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu) writes: >>That is because 0.97 patch 1 is intended for gcc 2.2.2d. I will try to release ... - Free no longer works under PL 1 for me, though it was fine ... that, I'm sticking with PL 1 - its much quicker than PL 0 ...

linux-activists - Jean Liddle - Aug 8 1992 - 18:35

... |> >That is because 0.97 patch 1 is intended for gcc 2.2.2d. I will try to ... That's wierd; I just applied patch 1 and had no problem whatsoever ... are not attempting to make build(1). I also successfully built 0.97 patch 1, but only because I left ...

linux-activists - Bob Green - Aug 10 1992 - 07:57

In article pete@q106fm.UUCP (pete cervasio) writes: NEAT TRICK TIME: If you're in Emacs and do a 'M-x compile', 'C-x o' (to jump into the compile buffer right away) and then arrow down about two lines below ...

linux-activists - Craig Burley - Aug 11 1992 - 14:37

... 2.2.2d. I will try to re > |> >it to public this weekend. > ... are not attempting to make build(1). I also > successfully built 0.97 patch 1, but only because I left ... at the same time, applied the patch before compiling ANYTHING, made the appropriate ...

linux-activists - pete cervasio - Aug 10 1992 - 22:25