... wrote: > > Originally from: Herbert Poetzl > > This is the core of the read-only bind mount patch set. > > Note that this does _not_ add a "ro" option directly to > the bind mount operation. If you require such a mount, ...

linux-fsdevel - Al Viro - Jun 18 2006 - 14:36

... > > Originally from: Herbert Poetzl > > > > This is the core of the read-only bind mount patch set. > > > > Note that this does _not_ add a "ro" option directly to > > the bind mount operation. If you require such a mount, ...

linux-fsdevel - Dave Hansen - Jun 19 2006 - 12:45

... at 07:47:33AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote: > Hi there, > > This patch is a guess at what's missing, to fix a compile failure ... > Compile tested. This looks correct, I'll add it to my patch queue, thanks. greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: ...

linux-kernel - Greg KH - Jan 31 2007 - 17:16

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:10:30PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > --- > > lxc-dave/net/unix/af_unix.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff -

linux-fsdevel - Herbert Poetzl - Jun 8 2006 - 07:07

On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:29 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > +enum trace_flag_type { > + TRACE_FLAG_IRQS_OFF = 0x01, > + TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED = 0x02, > + TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED_DELAYED = 0x04, > +

linux-kernel - Daniel Walker - Jan 9 2008 - 23:41

Artem Bityutskiy writes: (haven't read the whole thing) > + inode->i_gid = current->fsgid; > + inode->i_mode = mode; > + inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; Any specific reason you

linux-kernel - Andi Kleen - Mar 27 2008 - 09:36

Andi Kleen wrote: >> + inode->i_gid = current->fsgid; >> + inode->i_mode = mode; >> + inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; > > Any specific reason you didn't implement sub second time stamp support? > There is

linux-kernel - Artem Bityutskiy - Mar 27 2008 - 09:42

Hi Artem, On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > +static int ubifs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) > +{ > + /* > + * An attempt to dirty a page without budgeting for it - should

linux-kernel - Pekka Enberg - Apr 1 2008 - 08:08

Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Artem, > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Artem Bityutskiy > wrote: >> +static int ubifs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) >> +{ >> + /* >> + * An attempt to dirty a page

linux-kernel - Artem Bityutskiy - Apr 1 2008 - 08:42

Hi Artem, On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > > +static int ubifs_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t unused_gfp_flags) > > > +{ > > > + /* > > > + * An attempt to release a dirty page

linux-kernel - Pekka Enberg - Apr 1 2008 - 09:12

Pekka Enberg wrote: >> Yeah, this is also a guarding thing. When a dirty page is released >> the budget which was allocated for it has to be freed. If this function >> is called, then the budget was not freed, which must never happen. > > So what

linux-kernel - Artem Bityutskiy - Apr 1 2008 - 10:04

Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Pekka Enberg wrote: >>> Yeah, this is also a guarding thing. When a dirty page is released >>> the budget which was allocated for it has to be freed. If this function >>> is called, then the budget was not freed, which

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 1 2008 - 11:14