Found 15 matching messages (0.050 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/3] gitweb: SHA-1 in commit log message links to "object" view
...
> ---
> This follows the "lazy hyperlink" idea of symbolic link support in the
> "tree" view.
>
> It is an RFC (Requests For Comments) because I'm not sure if it
> wouldn't be better to make dead SHA-1 marked in commit log message, ...
git - Junio C Hamano - Dec 10 2006 - 17:29
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/4, second shot]KVM uses "account_guest_time()"
KVM updates vtime in task_struct to allow account_guest_time() to modify user,
system and guest time in cpustat accordingly.
linux-kernel - Laurent Vivier - Aug 17 2007 - 07:54
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings
... wrong format strings in modpost exposed by the previous patch.
> Including one missing argument -- some random data was ... > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/scripts/mod/modpost.c ...
linux-netdev - Sam Ravnborg - Dec 10 2007 - 14:50
- Re: [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings
... wrong format strings in modpost exposed by the previous patch.
> Including one missing argument -- some random data was ... > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/scripts/mod/modpost.c ...
linux-kernel - Sam Ravnborg - Dec 10 2007 - 14:50
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */
> +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo)
> +{
> + struct skb_shinfo_tun *sht = (void *)(sinfo + 1);
> +
> + /*
linux-kernel - Herbert Xu - Apr 7 2008 - 01:13
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */
> +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo)
> +{
> + struct skb_shinfo_tun *sht = (void *)(sinfo + 1);
> +
> + /*
linux-netdev - Herbert Xu - Apr 7 2008 - 01:13
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */
> > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo)
> > +{
> > + struct
linux-kernel - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 03:24
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */
> > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo)
> > +{
> > + struct
linux-netdev - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 03:24
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000
> On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On second thought, this is not going to work. The network stack
> > can clone individual pages out of this skb
linux-kernel - David Miller - Apr 7 2008 - 03:35
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000
> On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On second thought, this is not going to work. The network stack
> > can clone individual pages out of this skb
linux-netdev - David Miller - Apr 7 2008 - 03:35
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
On Monday 07 April 2008 17:35:28 David Miller wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell
> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000
>
> > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On second thought, this is not going to work.
linux-kernel - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 21:51
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.
On Monday 07 April 2008 17:35:28 David Miller wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell
> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000
>
> > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On second thought, this is not going to work.
linux-netdev - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 21:51
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks
Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_spinlock *, lock_spinners);
>>
>
> The plural is a bit misleading, as this is a single pointer per CPU.
>
Yeah. And it's
linux-kernel - Jeremy Fitzhardinge - Jul 8 2008 - 03:15
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks
Hi,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes:
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_spinlock *, lock_spinners);
>>>
>>
>> The plural is a bit misleading,
linux-kernel - Johannes Weiner - Jul 8 2008 - 03:30
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks
... in the order that they're supposed to take the
> spinlock.
> ... include/xen/events.h | 7 +
> 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 1 ... -1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* announce we're spinning */
> + spinning_lock(xl);
> +
> + /* clear pending ...
linux-kernel - Johannes Weiner - Jul 8 2008 - 02:37