login
Header Space

 
 

Mailing list archives

Search results

Found 15 matching messages (0.050 seconds). Page 1 of 1.

Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/3] gitweb: SHA-1 in commit log message links to "object" view

... > --- > This follows the "lazy hyperlink" idea of symbolic link support in the > "tree" view. > > It is an RFC (Requests For Comments) because I'm not sure if it > wouldn't be better to make dead SHA-1 marked in commit log message, ...

git - Junio C Hamano - Dec 10 2006 - 17:29

Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/4, second shot]KVM uses "account_guest_time()"

KVM updates vtime in task_struct to allow account_guest_time() to modify user, system and guest time in cpustat accordingly.

linux-kernel - Laurent Vivier - Aug 17 2007 - 07:54

Re: [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings

... wrong format strings in modpost exposed by the previous patch. > Including one missing argument -- some random data was ... > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux/scripts/mod/modpost.c ...

linux-netdev - Sam Ravnborg - Dec 10 2007 - 14:50

Re: [PATCH RFC] [4/9] modpost: Fix format string warnings

... wrong format strings in modpost exposed by the previous patch. > Including one missing argument -- some random data was ... > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux/scripts/mod/modpost.c ...

linux-kernel - Sam Ravnborg - Dec 10 2007 - 14:50

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

Rusty Russell wrote: > > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */ > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo) > +{ > + struct skb_shinfo_tun *sht = (void *)(sinfo + 1); > + > + /*

linux-kernel - Herbert Xu - Apr 7 2008 - 01:13

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

Rusty Russell wrote: > > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */ > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo) > +{ > + struct skb_shinfo_tun *sht = (void *)(sinfo + 1); > + > + /*

linux-netdev - Herbert Xu - Apr 7 2008 - 01:13

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */ > > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo) > > +{ > > + struct

linux-kernel - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 03:24

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */ > > +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo) > > +{ > > + struct

linux-netdev - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 03:24

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000 > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > > On second thought, this is not going to work. The network stack > > can clone individual pages out of this skb

linux-kernel - David Miller - Apr 7 2008 - 03:35

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000 > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > > On second thought, this is not going to work. The network stack > > can clone individual pages out of this skb

linux-netdev - David Miller - Apr 7 2008 - 03:35

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

On Monday 07 April 2008 17:35:28 David Miller wrote: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000 > > > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On second thought, this is not going to work.

linux-kernel - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 21:51

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] tun: vringfd xmit support.

On Monday 07 April 2008 17:35:28 David Miller wrote: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:24:51 +1000 > > > On Monday 07 April 2008 15:13:44 Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On second thought, this is not going to work.

linux-netdev - Rusty Russell - Apr 7 2008 - 21:51

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks

Johannes Weiner wrote: >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1; >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_spinlock *, lock_spinners); >> > > The plural is a bit misleading, as this is a single pointer per CPU. > Yeah. And it's

linux-kernel - Jeremy Fitzhardinge - Jul 8 2008 - 03:15

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks

Hi, Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes: > Johannes Weiner wrote: >>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1; >>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xen_spinlock *, lock_spinners); >>> >> >> The plural is a bit misleading,

linux-kernel - Johannes Weiner - Jul 8 2008 - 03:30

Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks

... in the order that they're supposed to take the > spinlock. > ... include/xen/events.h | 7 + > 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 1 ... -1) > + return 0; > + > + /* announce we're spinning */ > + spinning_lock(xl); > + > + /* clear pending ...

linux-kernel - Johannes Weiner - Jul 8 2008 - 02:37

speck-geostationary