... changed if current cpu is changed. mm/slab.c:cache_alloc_refill() if ... do { } while (0) >> +# define slab_irq_disable_nort(cpu) do { } while (0) >> +# define slab_irq_enable_nort( ... PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a nop > for PREEMPT_RT ...

linux-kernel - Hiroshi Shimamoto - Mar 20 2008 - 16:10

... @ct.jp.nec.com> > --- > mm/slab.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 files changed, ... (int, slab_irq_locks) = { 0, }; > do { slab_irq_enable(cpu); (void) (flags); } while (0) > # define ... PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a nop for PREEMPT_RT ...

linux-kernel - Steven Rostedt - Mar 20 2008 - 15:32

... 20 Mar 2008, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > >> mm/slab.c:cache_alloc_refill() >> if (unlikely(!ac->avail)) ... are the PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a nop >>> for PREEMPT_RT. I ... this is > not the case, then we need to fix that. No, this ...

linux-kernel - Hiroshi Shimamoto - Mar 21 2008 - 16:47

... 20 Mar 2008, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > > mm/slab.c:cache_alloc_refill() > if (unlikely(!ac->avail)) ... are the PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a nop > > for PREEMPT_RT. I ... If this is not the case, then we need to fix that. I'll try ...

linux-kernel - Steven Rostedt - Mar 21 2008 - 16:37

... this a bug in mainline? The !PREEMPT_RT case should be as close to > > ... case, then we need to fix that. > > No, this issue is in -rt only. > Hi Hiroshi, Thanks again for ... . I'll write up another patch to fix this. Thanks, -- Steve P.S. ...

linux-kernel - Steven Rostedt - Mar 24 2008 - 16:35

... a bug in mainline? The !PREEMPT_RT case should be as close to ... No, this issue is in -rt only. > > > > Hi Hiroshi, > > Thanks again ... 'll write up another patch to fix > this. > Actually, I'm going to take your patch. Seems that the reason Ingo ...

linux-kernel - Steven Rostedt - Mar 24 2008 - 16:40

... this a bug in mainline? The !PREEMPT_RT case should be as close to >>> mainline ... that. >> No, this issue is in -rt only. >> > > Hi Hiroshi, > > Thanks again for ... . I'll write up another patch to fix > this. Sounds smarter. > > Thanks, > ...

linux-kernel - Hiroshi Shimamoto - Mar 24 2008 - 16:54

... bug in mainline? The !PREEMPT_RT case should be as close to ... code. If this is >>>> not the case, then we need to ... No, this issue is in -rt only. >>> >> Hi Hiroshi, >> >> Thanks again ... ll write up another patch to fix >> this. >> > > Actually, I'm ...

linux-kernel - Hiroshi Shimamoto - Mar 24 2008 - 17:11

... wrote: > And these are the PREEMPT_RT version. So basically, this patch is a > nop > for PREEMPT_RT. I doubt it will solve ... ;-) He said it was a !PREEMPT_RT issue (in the -rt tree) .. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line " ...

linux-kernel - Daniel Walker - Mar 21 2008 - 14:11