... When git-revert has a file argument then redirect the user ... Habouzit > --- > builtin-revert.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- > gitk | 2 +- > 2 ... dirty F*CK this chunk is obviously spurious. --=20 =C2=B7O ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 5 2007 - 15:04

... commit '%s', did you meant: " > >+ "git checkout HEAD -- '%s'", arg, arg) ... >=20 > But that suggested command is not going to convince anyone ... learn. I wonder if instead of saying, "I=20 > know what ... we should make git revert just do what the user meant ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 5 2007 - 15:50

... revert " commits the result, "git revert --= =20 > > " should, too. >=20 ... 'm quite sure you're wrong, because everyone is used to that: ... : Restore pristine working copy file (undo most local edits). $ darcs help revert ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 6 2007 - 04:49

... writes: > But that suggested command is not going to convince anyone ... make git revert just do what the user meant. > > There is ... to checkout paths out of the index. "git checkout paths..." does ... lead to more user confusion is because after that point you ...

git - Junio C Hamano - Nov 5 2007 - 18:21

... make git revert just do what the user meant. > > > > There is ... -way to > checkout paths out of the index. Okay, let's ... what Steven proposed.) To continue the analogy, it would have to ... supposedly narrowing users down to one-way-to-do-things only ...

git - Johannes Schindelin - Nov 5 2007 - 19:40

... commit '%s', did you meant: " > + "git checkout HEAD -- '%s'", arg, arg); But that suggested command is not going to convince anyone ... learn. I wonder if instead of saying, "I know what you ... make git revert just do what the user meant. There is ...

git - Steven Grimm - Nov 5 2007 - 15:28

... we should > make git revert just do what the user meant ... which is probably not what the user wants. Most of them ... a different case: you're basically performing the same operation, with ... applying just to a subset of files. - Alex - To unsubscribe from ...

git - Alejandro Martinez Ruiz - Nov 5 2007 - 17:54

... we should >> make git revert just do what the user meant ... which is > probably not what the user wants. Most of them ... This is a different case: you're basically performing the same ... moves HEAD. The second one doesn't. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15 ...

git - David Kastrup - Nov 5 2007 - 18:06

... >=20 > > > But that suggested command is not going to convince anyone ... -way to > > checkout paths out of the index. >=20 > Okay, let's ... it=20 > was committed at one stage. I agree that this ... git-revert is implemented, you'll see that it uses the ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 5 2007 - 20:08

... it, since = it > > >> was committed at one stage. > > > > > > Allowing people to ... And the logical thing to try that really is > > git revert ... we don't wan't git revert -- path/to/file to ... meant, hinting him in the direction of the proper command. I ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 6 2007 - 08:48

... commit it, >>>>> since it >>>>> was committed at one stage. >>>> >>>> Allowing people to revert ... really advocating that > git-revert should be a complete implementation of what git ... unfortunate that the term "revert" is used by most other SCMs to ...

git - Wincent Colaiuta - Nov 6 2007 - 13:43

... Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert " to mean "revert = the=20 > > > changes to < ... > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. > > Not what I ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 6 2007 - 15:39

... " commits the result, "git revert -- > > > > " should, too. > > > > > > I was ... And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert < ... every command perform enitrely all kinds of actions > just because other SCMs ...

git - Mike Hommey - Nov 6 2007 - 16:13

... revert " commits the result, "git revert -- > > " should, too. > > I was not ... . And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert ... the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger. ...

git - Johannes Schindelin - Nov 6 2007 - 08:32

... we allow "git revert " to mean "revert the > changes to ... it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert ... add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. Not what ... line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo ...

git - Junio C Hamano - Nov 6 2007 - 14:06

... we allow "git revert " to mean "revert the > > changes to ... it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert ... Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. > > Really ... line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo ...

git - Johannes Schindelin - Nov 6 2007 - 14:27

... " commits the result, "git revert -- > > > " should, too. > > > > I was ... And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert < ... every command perform enitrely all kinds of actions just because other SCMs interpret ...

git - Robin Rosenberg - Nov 6 2007 - 16:06

... > > it, since it was committed at one stage. > > Allowing people to revert or cherry pick partially by using paths > limiter is a very good idea; the ... revert " commits the result, "git revert -- " should, too. You can ...

git - Johannes Schindelin - Nov 5 2007 - 23:18

... cherry pick partially by using paths >> limiter is a very good idea; the whole "it comes from a commit ... " commits the result, "git revert -- > " should, too. I ... line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@ ...

git - Junio C Hamano - Nov 6 2007 - 00:54

... C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > > >> Allowing people to revert or cherry pick partially by using ... " commits the result, "git revert = --=20 > > > > " should, too. > ... >=20 > > If git revert -- path1 path2 path3 is going to ...

git - Pierre Habouzit - Nov 6 2007 - 05:37