Found 7 matching messages (0.139 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
... all the event handling functions: epoll_create, signalfd, timerfd, eventd. > > > > There is good news ... for all the functions. > > > > For signalfd and eventfd no flags parameter is available ... > Besides that, patches look fine to me (though w/out a ...
linux-kernel - Michael Kerrisk - Apr 28 2008 - 03:12
... all the event handling functions: epoll_create, signalfd, timerfd, eventd. > > There is good news ... for all the functions. > > For signalfd and eventfd no flags parameter is available ... ugly. Besides that, patches look fine to me (though w/out a very ...
linux-kernel - Davide Libenzi - Apr 27 2008 - 19:20
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Davide Libenzi wrote: > Ok, I asked this myself for about ten minutes, than I gave up. But why > sys_epoll_createp() instead of sys_epoll_create2()? There MUST be a reason > to deviate from the
linux-kernel - Ulrich Drepper - Apr 27 2008 - 19:27
Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > I used the number at the end for syscalls which aren't visible at > userlevel. There they are useful indicating the number of arguments. > At userlevel I personally find it less than optimal but I'd have no > problem
linux-kernel - H. Peter Anvin - Apr 27 2008 - 19:31
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > But surely these will have to be exposed to the user level somehow? You didn't read what I wrote in the first mail. When I added the interface to glibc I already added a flags
linux-kernel - Ulrich Drepper - Apr 27 2008 - 19:33
Ulrich Drepper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> But surely these will have to be exposed to the user level somehow? > > You didn't read what I wrote in the first mail. When I added the >
linux-kernel - H. Peter Anvin - Apr 27 2008 - 19:38
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Ok, I asked this myself for about ten minutes, than I gave up. But why > > sys_epoll_createp() instead of
linux-kernel - Davide Libenzi - Apr 27 2008 - 20:07
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Alan Cox | [PATCH 00/76] Queued TTY Patches |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc2 |
| Jared Hulbert | [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem |
git: | |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: git pull for update of netdev fails. |
| bain | [Announce] teamGit v0.0.3 |
| Robin Rosenberg | Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32 |
| Jacob Yocom-Piatt | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| Siju George | This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Julius Volz | [PATCHv3 13/24] IPVS: Add IPv6 support to xmit() support functions |
| Stephen Hemminger | Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: remove addresses and routes when carrier is lost |
| Enrico Demarin | HTB and ingress scheduler SMP Soft Lockup in 2.6.23-2.6.25-rc8 |
| Jeff Kirsher | [RESEND][NET-NEXT PATCH 03/29] ixgbe: fix multicast address update |
