Found 80 matching messages (0.232 seconds). Page 1 of 4.
... not a possibility - we don't get patches through >>> mailing lists, so we need the ... one of reasons to chose Git over Subversion. >>> Lazy clone sounded like the right idea to me. With this >>> proof-of-concept implementation, just about 550M from the ...
git - Jakub Narebski - Feb 10 2008 - 21:20
... 'lazy clone' I've read about a > bit in the git ... not see implemented > anywhere - the clone that fetches a minimal amount ... possibility - we don't get patches through > mailing lists, so we ... to me. With this > proof-of-concept implementation, just about 550M ...
git - Jakub Narebski - Feb 8 2008 - 15:00
... a possibility - we don't get patches through > > mailing lists, so we need ... it will be doable _if_ the git wins & will be chosen for OOo. > > Lazy clone sounded like ... idea to me. With this > > proof-of-concept implementation, just about 550M from ...
git - Jan Holesovsky - Feb 9 2008 - 11:27
... 'lazy clone' I've read about a bit in the > git ... not see implemented anywhere - the clone > that fetches a minimal amount ... possibility - we > don't get patches through mailing lists, so we ... to me. With this proof-of-concept > implementation, just about 550M ...
git - Mike Hommey - Feb 8 2008 - 14:49
... 'lazy clone' I've read about a bit in the > git mailing ... a possibility - we > don't get patches through mailing lists, so we ... to me. With this proof-of-concept > implementation, just about 550M ... was the svn repo you're testing? My experience has been ...
git - Harvey Harrison - Feb 8 2008 - 14:14
... fool-proof: a user should explicitely ask for a lazy clone. > diff --git a/index-pack.c ... remote-alternates (note the dash instead of the underscore) > + char path[PATH_MAX ... +5); Puh. What a big patch! But as I said, it is ...
git - Johannes Schindelin - Feb 8 2008 - 16:16
... I meant here is
> the result of
>
> $ git verify-pack -v
git - Johannes Schindelin - Feb 14 2008 - 19:38
... know what takes most space.
>
> $ ~/git/contrib/stats/packinfo.pl < \
> objects/ ... meant here
is the result of
$ git verify-pack -v
git - Jakub Narebski - Feb 14 2008 - 17:59
Hi Jakub, On Thursday 14 of February 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > ... wouldn't be better solution than lazy clone. But it is nice to ... about feature, even if at RFC stage, but with some code. Yes ... the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to ...
git - Jan Holesovsky - Feb 15 2008 - 05:43
... .cz> writes: > One of the reasons why 'lazy clone' was not ... than > pack which is result of fast-import driven import. > > Both ... make them. There are some patches for making repack work multi ... into the main git tree yet. These patches work almost linearly ...
git - Jon Smirl - Feb 8 2008 - 15:26
... suse.cz> writes: > > > > > One of the reasons why 'lazy clone' was not implemented ... tighter than > > > > > pack which is result of fast-import driven import. > > > > > > > > > > Both ... large repositories please let the git community know and your issues ...
git - Jon Smirl - Feb 8 2008 - 16:41
... you are right even in the --lazy option for clone instead of reusing -s. For the rest - I'll post the updated patch ASAP. Regards, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger. ...
git - Jan Holesovsky - Feb 9 2008 - 11:54
... what you want without modifying git. > For example, you can prepare several "shared" clones of your repo (git > clone -s) and ... in each only a few branches. Cloning from these will > only pull ... the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to ...
git - Johannes Schindelin - Feb 8 2008 - 15:04
... .cz> writes: > > One of the reasons why 'lazy clone' was not ... repack using .keep files, see git-config(1)) much tighter than ... than > > pack which is result of fast-import driven import. > > > > Both ... in sensible time! > > A lot of memory is 2-4GB. Without ...
git - Harvey Harrison - Feb 8 2008 - 16:19
... @suse.cz> writes: > > > One of the reasons why 'lazy clone' was not implemented was ... > > repack using .keep files, see git-config(1)) much tighter than with ... tighter than > > > pack which is result of fast-import driven import. > > > > > > Both Mozilla ...
git - Jon Smirl - Feb 8 2008 - 16:24
... @suse.cz> writes: > > > > One of the reasons why 'lazy clone' was not implemented ... > repack using .keep files, see git-config(1)) much tighter than with ... tighter than > > > > pack which is result of fast-import driven import. > > > > > > > > Both Mozilla ...
git - Harvey Harrison - Feb 8 2008 - 16:25
... Try taking a look at the "Git and GCC" that crossed borders between > the gcc and the git mailing lists. Just trying this ... what you want without modifying git. > For example, you can prepare several "shared" clones of your repo (git > clone -s) and ...
git - Jan Holesovsky - Feb 9 2008 - 11:06
... 2008, Marco Costalba wrote: > > > > > Linux git repository is not very big ... pack/ 454636 .git/objects/pack/ Of course, the clone time would ... only "master", and is fully (re-)packed. So I was not ... the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to ...
git - Johannes Schindelin - Feb 10 2008 - 13:45
... Schindelin wrote: > > Heh. I was too lazy to look up the usage, so ... make sense... > > > > So here it goes: > > > > $ git verify-pack -v > > objects/pack/pack ... unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to ...
git - Johannes Schindelin - Feb 14 2008 - 20:08
... Schindelin wrote: > > > Heh. I was too lazy to look up the usage, so I ... make sense... > > > > > > So here it goes: > > > > > > $ git verify-pack -v > > > objects/pack/pack- ... : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@ ...
git - Nicolas Pitre - Feb 14 2008 - 21:41
