Found 4 matching messages (0.101 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released
... 13 -0500
> So, here's v0.12.
I couldn't even ... 71,7 @@ int btrfs_insert_xattr_item(struct btrfs
key.objectid = dir;
btrfs_set_key_type(&key ... 02:36.000000000 -0800
@@ -75,12 +75,13 @@ static void str2hashbuf ... progs-0.12/hasher.c 2008-02-10 17:04:04 ...
linux-fsdevel - David Miller - Feb 10 2008 - 21:12
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released
... Mason
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:00:13 -0500
>
> This function never returns an error, so the ... thought into the unaligned access
problems.
> Similar code lives in the btrfs kernel code too, I'll try to get a
> partition at ...
linux-fsdevel - Chris Mason - Feb 11 2008 - 09:42
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Mason
> Date: Mon, ... I can tell you what the code
does.
This is all part of the btrfs code that supports tree block sizes larger than
a page. The extent_buffer ...
linux-fsdevel - Chris Mason - Feb 12 2008 - 09:43
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released
From: Chris Mason
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:42:20 -0500
> The kernel is actually worse, because the set/get macros are more complex.
> Some live in ctree.h like in the progs, but the nasty ones live in
> struct-funcs.c
linux-fsdevel - David Miller - Feb 12 2008 - 02:43
