... if we didn't call > lock_kernel() here at all? I've just been pushing the lock down. If the code already has enough internal locking for things like multiple ioctls in parallel then you can probably kill it entirely - ...

linux-kernel - Alan Cox - May 23 2008 - 07:04

... > lock_kernel() here at all? > > I've just been pushing the lock down. If the code already ... internal locking for things like multiple ioctls in parallel then you can > ... have a look. ACK for the patch from me. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe ...

linux-kernel - Rafael J. Wysocki - May 23 2008 - 07:22

... file_operations snapshot_fops = { .read = snapshot_read, .write = snapshot_write, .llseek = no_llseek, - .ioctl = snapshot_ioctl, + .unlocked_ioctl = snapshot_ioctl, }; static struct miscdevice snapshot_device = { -- To unsubscribe ...

linux-kernel - Alan Cox - May 22 2008 - 17:25

... snapshot_fops = { > .read = snapshot_read, > .write = snapshot_write, > .llseek = no_llseek, > - .ioctl = snapshot_ioctl, > + .unlocked_ioctl = snapshot_ioctl, > }; > > static struct miscdevice snapshot_device = { Thanks, Rafael -- ...

linux-kernel - Rafael J. Wysocki - May 22 2008 - 21:09