login
Header Space

 
 

Mailing list archives

Search results

Found 18 matching messages (0.146 seconds). Page 1 of 1.

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... > doesn't use modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. > > > > Big nack, I use it all the ... distributions you checked/ Well they should make them modules (two of them, ... 's been a long time since I considered a distro .config a benchmark/ ...

linux-kernel - Jens Axboe - Nov 25 2007 - 12:45

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. > > > > > > Big nack, I use it all the time for testing. > ... distributions you checked/ > > Well they should make them modules (two of them, ... need 4 different schedulers at all? I have the gut feeling that the ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Nov 25 2007 - 12:56

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:56:54 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Is there any technical reason why we need 4 different schedulers at > all? > there is at least one technical reason to need more than one: certain types of storage (both

linux-kernel - Arjan van de Ven - Nov 25 2007 - 19:27

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

On 25-11-2007 18:22, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: ... >> Is there any technical reason why we need 4 different schedulers at all? > > Until we have the perfect scheduler :-) IMHO this is not enough yet. There is

linux-kernel - Jarek Poplawski - Nov 27 2007 - 03:09

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:09:12AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On 25-11-2007 18:22, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > ... > >> Is there any technical reason why we need 4 different schedulers at all? > > > > Until

linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Nov 27 2007 - 12:47

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... the kernel image of an x86 defconfig (that > doesn't use modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. Big nack, I use it all the time for testing. Just because you don't happen to use it is ...

linux-kernel - Jens Axboe - Nov 25 2007 - 12:21

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... kernel image of an x86 defconfig (that > > doesn't use modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. > > Big nack, I use it all the time for testing. OK. > Just because you don't > happen to ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Nov 25 2007 - 12:31

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. > > > > > > > > Big nack, I use it all the ... distributions you checked/ > > > > Well they should make them modules (two of them, that ... several drivers for the same hardware. I'm not disputing that. -- Jens Axboe ...

linux-kernel - Jens Axboe - Nov 25 2007 - 13:22

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... the workloads that deadline is good at, > so not quite yet. > > > I have the gut feeling that the usual thing happens and people ... risk with "duplicate", like several drivers for the > same hardware. I'm not disputing that. Actually, both 'cfq' and 'as ...

linux-kernel - Al Boldi - Nov 26 2007 - 00:57

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... the workloads that deadline is good at, > > so not quite yet. > > > > > I have the gut feeling that the usual thing happens and ... with "duplicate", like several drivers for the > > same hardware. I'm not disputing that. > > Actually, both 'cfq' and ' ...

linux-kernel - Andrew Morton - Nov 26 2007 - 01:12

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... stagnation. Btw., after this 'forking' thing etc. it seems I might have lost the point a little: which removed choices should justify such a fork. But, I hope, you didn't mean your patch only, because then e.g. this stagnation threat looks ...

linux-kernel - Jarek Poplawski - Nov 27 2007 - 19:02

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... :15 PM: > Adrian Bunk wrote, On 11/27/2007 05:47 PM: ... >> There is nothing like a "right of choice". (very late) PS: ...I was a bit confused with this, wondering: so, we've envied you (the West) this "thing" for so many years, and now ...

linux-kernel - Jarek Poplawski - Dec 30 2007 - 13:52

[2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB. Signed-off-by: Adrian ... default y ---help--- The anticipatory I/O scheduler is generally a ... elevator.h @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ struct elevator_ops elevator_init_fn *elevator_init_fn; elevator_exit_fn ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Nov 25 2007 - 12:18

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... . Please do not do that) Thanks! I'm replying off list. > On Mon, ... is good at, > > > so not quite yet. > > > > > > > I have the gut feeling that the ... several drivers for the > > > same hardware. I'm not disputing that. > > > > Actually, both ...

linux-kernel - Al Boldi - Nov 26 2007 - 01:28

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... ". Maybe you are right, maybe I've used wrong words... But, ... about this first right too. And I've meant generally, not about open ... than no choice. And, since I don't know anything in open ... take away offered choices; actually, I think it would be much ...

linux-kernel - Jarek Poplawski - Nov 27 2007 - 18:15

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... could suggest you've understood, what I've meant. And maybe abortion isn't ... maintainers should be always considered. But, I was rather against something else: removing ... , removing is something necessary, but I wish you many problems! (== many users) ...

linux-kernel - Jarek Poplawski - Nov 27 2007 - 20:20

Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular

... about this first right too. And I've meant generally, > not about open ... in many cases. > And, since I don't know anything in ... take away offered choices; actually, I > think it would be much ... removers in the kernel [1], I can tell you what actually ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Bunk - Nov 27 2007 - 18:53

speck-geostationary