Found 59 matching messages (0.020 seconds). Page 1 of 3.
On 10/11/07, knitti <knitti@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > after some sleep and coffee I am embarrassed to realize I made two ... BIOS drive 0x80 > dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 > root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b > > > greetings, > knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 12 2007 - 06:21
... no.0023@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, I know.
>
> On 11/8/07, knitti <knitti@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/07, 23 $B9f (B
openbsd-misc - knitti - Nov 8 2007 - 11:20
On 1/4/08, Nick Guenther
openbsd-misc - knitti - Jan 7 2008 - 08:22
On 1/29/08, knitti <knitti@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/29/08, Chris
openbsd-misc - knitti - Jan 29 2008 - 08:14
On 10/14/07, Greg Oster
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 14 2007 - 16:35
On 11/14/07, Clint Pachl
openbsd-misc - knitti - Nov 14 2007 - 18:36
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet
openbsd-misc - knitti - Dec 11 2007 - 20:34
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet
openbsd-misc - knitti - Dec 12 2007 - 17:03
... -39130 manufactured in October 1998 2 Quantum Atlas IV (should also be from the last century) *If* someone from the OpenBSD developer community can use them, I would ship them anywhere in the EU, preferrably in Germany. greetings, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Sep 26 2007 - 04:28
... /AMD64 and are OK with a DOS bootdisk, search for MHDD. This is a really nice tool. Or just burn yourself an "ultimate boot cd" (ultimatebootcd.com), which also includes MHDD and a ton of other diagnosis and repair tools. greetings, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Sep 28 2007 - 07:31
... performance left and right. but if you have mail trouble, you can look at the underlaying smtp and imap servers and actually fix things, much more transparent than exchange (of which i also have some instances to look after) greetings, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 2 2007 - 18:18
... with TCP checksum offloading, and a suggested fix in one instance was jumpering the card down to 66 MHz. I can't tell if this is related in *any* way. I think there are some people here who *could* tell if you'd post a dmesg. gretings, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 8 2007 - 16:49
... .00/1.00, addr 1 usb2 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2: ServerWorks OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b greeting, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 10 2007 - 18:38
... 00/1.00, addr 1 usb2 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2: ServerWorks OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b greetings, knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 11 2007 - 08:19
... search can find the discussions for years to come. If you have read these, and you still post this then no answer in the world will make you change your mind. So, you made you statement, you got your attention, now go back playing. --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 11 2007 - 16:37
... CDs, too... I replied to Juan off-list, my bad. Read this: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html snapshot is not release, but some point in time of -currrent. 4.2 and current diverged in august. What you have to do is in the FAQ. --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 12 2007 - 06:02
... 850 3.4k 530 +/-150 +/-50 +/-500 +/-20 overall data transfer with dd: amd64/MP: 53-58 MB/s amd64/UP: 11-12 MB/s (about 19MB/s without ping -f) i386/MP: 52-56 MB/s i386/UP: 8- 9 MB/s --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 12 2007 - 06:22
... in RAM usage or massive forks? I saw once a system run out of mem, with no swap space exhibiting the same beviour. I could imagine (disclaimer: _didn't_ see that one) a system behave similiar after not being aber to fork anymore. --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 12 2007 - 08:51
... at ohci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2: ServerWorks OHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Kernelized RAIDframe activated dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 13 2007 - 16:43
... of wd1 is currently used." thats because there are tutorials on the web which create a degraded raid forcefully with one missing component. I gave this a shot. I also tried with wd0d, wd1d, which both exist and were not in use. --knitti
openbsd-misc - knitti - Oct 14 2007 - 12:39