... <1993Jun4.030406.25547@wixer.bga.com> rhodesia@wixer.bga.com (Felix S. Gallo) writes: >lukka@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tuomas J Lukka) writes: > >>XFree+Xlib take a lot more to compile... what's the point ...

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 4 1993 - 19:05

In article <1hr66bINNt25@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU> pdp@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (Paul Douglas Page) writes: >Hi there, >I was wondering if anyone has tried compiling gcc 2.3.3 for linux ? >The tar file for the source is over 7 mb long so I thought I'd

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Dec 30 1992 - 19:46

In article <1992Dec31.103122.24409@klaava.Helsinki.FI> wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius) writes: >jbh@feenix.metronet.com (Justin B Harvey) writes: >>I think that each software package should have a universal standaard >>file or directory of

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Dec 31 1992 - 23:55

In article Jeff-Randall@uiuc.edu (Jeff Randall) writes: >othman@ntrc25.ntrc.ntu.ac.sg (othman (EEE/Div 4)) writes: > >>It is a fully networking OS. >>It has almost everything that Linux has except dos emulator and

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jan 6 1993 - 04:59

In article <1qd223$a6n@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu (David Lesher) writes: >Others said: ># | Why not try something distinctively *Finnish* for the Mascott/Logo? ># | I mean, that's where it all *started* right? > >Shucks... >I

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Apr 13 1993 - 18:03

In article <9960@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> bcr@bohr.physics.purdue.edu (Bill C. Riemers) writes: >In article <1993Apr22.164559.5996@bcsfse.ca.boeing.com> pannon@bcsfse.ca.boeing.com (Joe Pannon) writes: >>I am not sure it's such a good idea to

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Apr 28 1993 - 08:12

I had a thought about this recently: the reason Ms-windows is so much more popular and will be, instead of X is because it's easy. There are 'good' (meager) defaults that are well documented. X-windows is a beast to use if you can't understand

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 7 1993 - 13:05

In article k2@bl.physik.tu-muenchen.de (Klaus Steinberger) writes: >dale@mkseast.uucp (Dale Gass) writes: > >>Nobody's gonna release a commercial product if the GPL forces them to release >>all their source code; re-

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 9 1993 - 06:03

In article <1v79qu$bvr@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> s_titz@ira.uka.de (Olaf Titz) writes: >In article <1993Jun08.024645.6901@taylor.uucp> mark@taylor.uucp (Mark A. Davis) writes: > >> to lots of software and stuff. But ease of use IS there. Look at the

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 10 1993 - 10:56

>Instead, you might see another curiosity begin to happen...application >developers packaging Linux (or 386BSD) with their applications rather >than bothering to port them to Windows NT. After all, the costs could >easily justify such a decision,

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 15 1993 - 17:58

>In a short term, the pentium is probably the way to go: intel reportedly >got reasonable fp performance out of it, and "porting" linux shouldn't >be a problem. As to supporting new processors (the 68k and possibly any >sparc chips etc), I'm happy if

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 20 1993 - 06:47

>The standard does allow one to declare standard library functions >manually. Since the standard also allows the standard header files to >define function like macros for functions it implements, the macro >will expand the manual declarations. Hence,

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jun 22 1993 - 17:37

In article <1993Jul1.211554.3838@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders) writes: >hp@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Peter Holzer) writes: > >>I has very tempted to uuencode /vmunix and send that to the guy. If >>receives 50 GB of mail

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jul 2 1993 - 17:02

>Ah hem. Name the posix aplication that runs on WNT 'out of the box'? >File IO, remember. #include int main(int argc,char **argv) { printf("Hello World!\n"); } Tjl

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Jul 14 1993 - 17:53

In article <1993Jul30.054625.29889@pdact.pd.necisa.oz.au> dbell@pdact.pd.necisa.oz.au (David I. Bell) writes: > >Here is my CTRL-T status line patch for 0.99.pl11. For those of you >who don't know what this feature is, here is a quick description of

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Aug 4 1993 - 09:36

>Really? Name a typesetting program that is more flexible. Better >yet, name one that is easier to use. I know somebody is going to jump >in and say WinWord. I say bullshit - any program that requires you to >move your hands from the keyboard to

linux-activists - Tuomas J Lukka - Aug 5 1993 - 14:54