Thomas Gleixner schrieb: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Thomas Gleixner schrieb: >>> Thomas, >>> >>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Thomas Bächler wrote: >>>> x86_64 fails to compile for me with this error: ...

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Oct 30 2007 - 05:10

Thomas B=E4chler schrieb: > Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: >> On Saturday, 3 November 2007 12:31, Thomas B=E4chler wrote: >>> I am trying to boot 2.6.24-rc1-g74521c28 from the linux-2.6 git tree.= >>> During boot, I get a kernel oops when ...

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Nov 11 2007 - 07:57

Thomas B=E4chler schrieb: >=20 > I just remembered, a friend of mine got it to compile with the exact > same toolchain, but with a different configuration (which I don't have)= =2E > He used a snapshot tarball from yesterday though, not the git ...

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Nov 3 2007 - 06:04

Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: > On Saturday, 3 November 2007 12:31, Thomas B=E4chler wrote: >> I am trying to boot 2.6.24-rc1-g74521c28 from the linux-2.6 git tree. >> During boot, I get a kernel oops when ...

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Nov 3 2007 - 14:37

Commit 7628b0a8c01a02966d2228bdf741ddedb128e8f8 (drivers/net/tulip/dmfe: support basic carrier detection) breaks networking on my Davicom DM9009. ethtool always reports there is no link. tcpdump shows incoming packets, but TX is disabled. Reverting the

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Feb 5 2007 - 17:27

Thierry Vignaud schrieb: > disable link detection in your network config then (eg: > MII_NOT_SUPPORTED=yes in ifcfg-XXX depending on the distro). I don't have such an option in "my distro". What does it do and how would it change the fact that TX is

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Feb 6 2007 - 18:40

I first discovered this problem when updating to 2.6.23 final on x86_64. When I launched google earth, the kernel paniced. When I tried to reproduce, it oopsed instead of panicing. dri/drm seems to work generally, as I am running beryl without

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Oct 14 2007 - 06:22

Dave Airlie schrieb: > lets start with: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4a7b1d1d90d202a030688ab5b177c3c0f15ee3e > > and work from there.. I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that: As I _thought_ it had

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Oct 14 2007 - 06:44

Dave Airlie schrieb: >> I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that: As I _thought_ it had worked with >> rc6, I already found that commit. I reverted it and got a panic again >> (no trace, as I was in X), so this one doesn't seem to cause the problem. >> >

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Oct 14 2007 - 08:03

x86_64 fails to compile for me with this error: CC arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:434: Error: symbol `vsysc2' is already defined make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.o] Error 1 make:

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Oct 29 2007 - 17:46

>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9299 >=20 > I just tested again (with 2.6.24-rc2-gecd744ee). If I only load the 'ac= ' > kernel module and not the 'battery' kernel module, then the system boot= s > fine. However, if I load the '

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Nov 11 2007 - 14:57

Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: >> Replying to myself again. Apparently, a fix for this bug was applied t= o >> the linux-acpi tree independently of my bug report, see here: >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=3D=

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Nov 11 2007 - 15:06

Rafael J. Wysocki schrieb: > As promised, below is the list of reported regressions from 2.6.24 for which > there are no fixes in 2.6.25, AFAICS. > > I'm now going to start tracking regressions from 2.6.25, but bug #9832 used > for tracking the

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Apr 18 2008 - 02:50

Since 2.6.25-rc9, my Lenovo 3000 N100 (Core 2 Duo T5300), running x86_64 = does not wake up from ACPI S3 (Suspend to RAM) any more. The display=20 remains dark. Fix: Revert=20 http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Apr 19 2008 - 08:49

Len Brown schrieb: > Hello Mat, > I'm not familiar with "coretemp", can you point me to the exact version= > of the application you are running so I can see how it is getting at > the underlying information? I think there is some confusion here:

linux-kernel - Thomas Bächler - Apr 21 2008 - 12:10