Found 57 matching messages (0.026 seconds). Page 1 of 3.
... > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - May 9 2008 - 08:44
... Is this
intentional? If yes then
Acked-by: Szabolcs Szakacsits
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jun 17 2008 - 12:59
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Dave Chinner ... Aug 21, 2008 at 08:33:50PM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > > > The 'nobarrier' mount option made a big improvement: > > > > INteresting. Barriers make only ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 23 2008 - 08:52
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Joel Becker wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:29:47AM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > The test suite mostly checks POSIX compliance and works for FreeBSD, > > Solaris, and Linux with ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Apr 3 2008 - 00:12
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 00:29 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > The default file system type is ext3 and it passes all tests. > > Hmm.. I ran it ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Apr 6 2008 - 19:34
... at 10:33:30AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:29:47AM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > The test must be run as root user and requires a few basic Perl modules. > > > > ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Apr 6 2008 - 19:51
Hi, On Fri, 30 May 2008, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > * Szabolcs Szakacsits (szaka@ntfs-3g.org) wrote: > > > > We added ntfs-3g and fuse support, fixed the one crash and three hang > > ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - May 30 2008 - 15:58
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:26 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > > We tried compilebench (-i 30 -r 0) just for fun using kernel 2.6.26, > > freshly formatted ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 18 2008 - 13:37
... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:25:55 +0300 (MET DST)
> Szabolcs Szakacsits
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 20 2008 - 17:48
... :39:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:25:55 +0300 (MET DST)
> > Szabolcs Szakacsits
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 20 2008 - 22:46
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:04:18PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > One thing I just found out - my old *laptop* is ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 21 2008 - 13:33
... , 22 Aug 2008, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:33:50PM +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > The 'nobarrier' mount option made a big improvement: > > INteresting. Barriers make only a little difference on ...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Aug 22 2008 - 08:44
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > And another of my pet peeves with ->bmap is that it uses 0 to mean "sparse" > which causes a conflict on NTFS at least as block zero is part of the $Boot > system file so it is a real, valid block...
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Oct 27 2007 - 17:45
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 12:35 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > +static int reserve_user_mount(void) > > > +{ > > > + int err = 0; > > > + > > > + spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock); > > > +
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 8 2008 - 16:44
Hi, On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On Tue 2008-01-08 12:35:09, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > For the suspend issue, there are also no easy solutions. > > What are the non-easy solutions? A practical point of view I've seen
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 9 2008 - 05:19
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Along with this effort, could you let me know if the world actually > cares about online fsck? Now we know how to do it I think, but is it > worth the effort. Most users seem to care deeply about "
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 17 2008 - 08:29
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Karel Zak wrote: > mount: > - doesn't drop privileges properly when calling helpers [Ludwig Nussel] How can a mount helper know without being setuid root and redundantly doing mount(8)'s work that the user is allowed to
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 19 2008 - 11:21
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This is an experimental patch for supporing unprivileged mounts and > umounts. User unmount unfortunately still doesn't work if the kernel doesn't have the unprivileged mount support but as we
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 19 2008 - 12:05
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > But 'fusermount -u /tmp/test' does work, doesn't it? You're submitting patches to get rid of fusermount, aren't you? Most users absolutely have no idea what fusermount is and they would
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Jan 19 2008 - 17:42
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Yep. I chose 32K unused space in the prototype filesystem I wrote [1, 2.4 > era]. I'm pretty sure I got that number from some other filesystem, maybe > even some NTFS incarnation. NTFS superblock (
linux-fsdevel - Szabolcs Szakacsits - Feb 13 2008 - 20:51