Found 260 matching messages (0.048 seconds). Page 1 of 13.
Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Okay, Steven Grimm. How do you think _I_ can tell that Steven is your name > from looking at your _full_ name "Steven Grimm"? Huh? > > Exactly. I split at the space. > > At the ...
git - Steven Grimm - Jun 13 2007 - 21:19
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 26 2007 - 20:55
... to file2" Where did file2's contents come from? $ git blame b/file2 a7dbcfdc a/file1 (Steven Grimm 2007-06-19 10:36:20 -0700 1) other contents 69a87194 b/file2 (Steven Grimm 2007-06-19 10:43:29 -0700 2) more ...
git - Steven Grimm - Jun 19 2007 - 14:28
... as the
initial content when the editor is invoked.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jul 23 2007 - 00:17
... the editor is invoked.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jul 23 2007 - 09:32
... than the origin's
"master"
branch. This patch describes the actual behavior.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 5 2007 - 21:52
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 5 2007 - 23:14
... what happens when you don't have it.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 9 2007 - 20:20
... of progress reports then
appears to just sit there for a while before finishing.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 11 2007 - 22:46
Steven Grimm wrote: > Here's one use case for merge/pull/rebase that is, if not an everyday > thing, then at least fairly common in my group: Person B fixes a bug > in some code that's causing problems for the code person A is working > on. ...
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 14 2007 - 14:29
Steven Grimm wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> I had the impression that the use of "--ignore-if-in-upstream" in >> git-rebase avoids exactly this case: re-applying changes which are >> already in upstream. > Where's that option ...
git - Steven Grimm - Jan 16 2007 - 15:43
... ("bug in read-tree -m on A -> A/A"). Sorry for the noise; please ignore this thread. -Steve Steven Grimm wrote: > We've hit this problem with a git-svn-based repository where some > stuff got reorganized, but ...
git - Steven Grimm - Mar 16 2007 - 18:59
Steven Grimm wrote: > But if my version control tool misidentifies a rename on my behalf, > and there's nothing I can do about it because there's no way to > influence the tool's concept of what got renamed to what, then I'm not > going to ...
git - Steven Grimm - Mar 19 2007 - 15:45
... rm -r") to be used as an index filter with cg-admin-rewritehist.
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 15 2007 - 20:04
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 16 2007 - 03:46
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 16 2007 - 03:53
Steven Grimm wrote: > This allows "git rm -r --ignore-notfound" to be used as an index filter > with cg-admin-rewritehist. The documentation for that command recommends > using git-update-index --remove to filter files out of a tree's history, > ...
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 16 2007 - 04:12
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Apr 16 2007 - 04:17
On 5/7/07, Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - May 8 2007 - 03:16
... (though if you like I can resend the
whole patch with this line):
Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm
git - Steven Grimm - Jun 9 2007 - 13:47