Found 9 matching messages (0.001 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
... tested higher than 2500 though. Thanks, Steve Thomas Althoff wrote: > What about net. ... misc@openbsd.org] On Behalf > Of Steve Johnson > Sent: den 8 maj 2008 ... 750K sessions with conservative setting. > > Thanks again for help, > Steve Johnson
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 8 2008 - 18:19
... I could expect a
PF setup to scale.
Thanks again,
Steve Johnson
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-05-08, Steve Johnson
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 9 2008 - 09:51
... ? Thanks again to all for the responses and references, Steve Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2008-05-08, Otto ... , May 08, 2008 at 07:23:41AM -0400, Steve Johnson wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks for the information. This is the first time that I've used ...
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 8 2008 - 08:50
... net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 net.inet.carp.preempt=1 Any clue as to what could be the problem? Thanks a lot, Steve Johnson
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 7 2008 - 16:09
... be sufficient memory to scale our current and future session tracking needs, especially as this service will increase in load. Thanks again, Steve Johnson
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 8 2008 - 10:29
... different between the two). This is with aggressive setting, as I was getting passed 750K sessions with conservative setting. Thanks again for help, Steve Johnson
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 8 2008 - 17:18
Thanks for the information. This is the first time that I've used PF as a router based firewall and not with NAT. I didn't know that the state was on a per interface basis, and not global to the system. So this means that unless I want to allow all
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 8 2008 - 07:23
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >> I was still wondering what could be considered "maximum" session >> concurrency that I could expect, with various hardware combinations? >> Is anyone that can tell me if it could be feasible with OpenBSD and >> better
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 10 2008 - 08:29
Henning Brauer wrote: > > congestion in what sense? the congestion counter increasing? this isnot > necessarily a problem, it just must not grow fast. andof course you > want to bump your ipintrq length. > Yes, the congestion counter is what I
openbsd-misc - Steve Johnson - May 11 2008 - 13:04
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue |
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
git: | |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Kevin Ballard | Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names |
| Andreas Hildebrandt | CVS-$Id:$ replacement in git? |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: bug: git-sh-setup should not be in $PATH |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Darren Spruell | Re: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Alexey Suslikov | OT: OpenBSD on Asus eeePC |
| Michael Chan | Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images |
| Indan Zupancic | Re: Realtek 8111C transmit timed out |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| John P Poet | Realtek 8111C transmit timed out |
