... , Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Well, I already applied them, ... actually applied the old version, it looks like. Duh. Linus "uhh.. Too little coffee?" Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line " ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Oct 2 2006 - 17:00

... 7 May 2008 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > Which is why I'm 100% convinced it' ... of them (the console semaphore was another, iirc). Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - May 7 2008 - 13:27

... Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 01:49, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > struct pcred { > > > atomic_t count; > > ... _and_ to the VFS credentials) is true, though. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 30 2002 - 21:04

... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > And that in turn causes problems. You get all kinds of interesting ... get right: you just have to be careful). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Dec 3 2003 - 22:08

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I think that -EXDEV is not only OK, it's _required_. It may be ... goto exit2; so this case should already be ok, no? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line " ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Apr 2 2004 - 15:02

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > - ramfs deadlocks on "sync()", since it can't write out inodes > > ... circumstances before we do it in a "real" kernel. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line " ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Jun 25 2004 - 16:03

... wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:22:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > It's the UNIX way. > > Not if you allow link(2) on ... the reiser4 code, so I'm really _only_ arguing against special-case attributes. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 25 2004 - 17:00

... On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > No no. The stream you get from a directory is totally _independent_ of ... it hides the fact that there is no independent information. See my point? Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 26 2004 - 13:32

... On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Hans Reiser wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >For example, it's likely that most filesystems would _not_ allow linking ... apart from the container) on it too. Not all the world is reiser4. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 26 2004 - 19:27

... wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:44:52AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Going back to O_XATTR: that would end up doing the "special ... and pipes, for example) "attr:attribute@/path/to/file" pick your poison. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 28 2004 - 15:16

... Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:24:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So basically: the "d_mounted++" just makes sure we get into > > " ... we should not _always_ create a vfsmount, that would just break the existign logic. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 26 2004 - 19:57

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > if (vfsmount is marked as hybrid && dentry == vfsmount->mnt_dentry) > > return; > ... we return NULL at that point. Got it. Yes, I bow before your cunningness. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 27 2004 - 00:46

... On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Hans Reiser wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >. Doing transactions on one file is > >only the beginning - you'll ... before you can "sell" people on the idea). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Sep 2 2004 - 03:36

... On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, James Bruce wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >In other words, nobody is really ever going to take advantage of ... . Similarly, there are probably perfectly fine interfaces for the issue of transactions.. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Sep 2 2004 - 13:50

... Sep 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Mer, 2004-09-01 at 21:50, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > and quite frankly, I think you can do the above pretty much ... they'd still have to support systems/filesystems that can't be converted. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Sep 2 2004 - 13:46

... On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Why do you think it would kill the FUSE process? And ... dirty pages you accept through normal "write()" calls). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Nov 18 2004 - 14:47

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The generic "page cache for symlinks" code does _not_ support invalidating > ... a comment at the head of page_follow_link_light() too. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 19 2005 - 12:21

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > - document this as a fundamental fact, and apply the ncpfs patch. Local ... , but even simpler than the NFS trick. Anybody? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Aug 19 2005 - 12:43

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And if it _is_ properly named (ie it really does mean "this ... flag saying that it's negative. We do not have negative inode caches. Linus

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Nov 15 2005 - 12:54

... Dobriyan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:14:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > This is a free'd page fault, so it's due to ... , rather than working _directly_ on UFS issues). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the ...

linux-fsdevel - Linus Torvalds - Jan 13 2006 - 11:45