login
Header Space

 
 

Mailing list archives

Search results

Found 14 matching messages (0.055 seconds). Page 1 of 1.

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Matthias Lederhofer wrote: > Joseph Wakeling <joseph.wakeling@webdrake.net> wrote: >> I remember coming across the same issue as Matthieu and never got round >> to solving it. In my case the desire ...

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 14:00

Problems with using git

Hello all, I'm a physics PhD student, not much experienced in serious software writing, but I've got to the point where I felt learning to use a version control system would be worthwhile. I decided to go for git rather than CVS or Subversion

git - Joseph Wakeling - Mar 1 2006 - 20:25

Re: Problems with using git

Thanks very much to all who offered advice on this. :-) Unfortunately openSUSE is somewhat out of sync not just with git but in libraries necessary to install the latest version (libcrypto.so.4, libssl.so.4). The openssl (0.9.7g-2.4) and openssl-

git - Joseph Wakeling - Mar 2 2006 - 09:52

git and bzr

Hello all, Following the very interesting debate about the differences between bzr and git, I thought it was about time I tried to learn properly about git and how to use it. I've been using bzr for a good while now, although since I'm not a

git - Joseph Wakeling - Nov 27 2006 - 20:01

Re: git and bzr

Thanks to everyone for your very detailed responses. :-) On the subject of blame and pulling patches from unrelated branches, Jakub Narebski wrote: > In git repository can have unrelated branches. So you can fetch unrelated > repository into your

git - Joseph Wakeling - Nov 28 2006 - 22:23

git blame [was: git and bzr]

Linus Torvalds wrote: > Now, with small changes, "git blame -C" will just ignore copies entirely, Obvious when I think about it, otherwise every 'int i;' in the kernel would have a huge blame list ... :-O > I think Junio screwed up at some point.

git - Joseph Wakeling - Nov 29 2006 - 08:17

Re: git blame [was: git and bzr]

Linus Torvalds wrote: > So it's fixed now, and probably would never trigger except for the stupid > special case that was "let's just show an example of this" ;) I'm very happy my stupidity could help. ;-) On a related note ... Nicholas Allen

git - Joseph Wakeling - Nov 30 2006 - 14:24

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Matthias Lederhofer wrote: > I don't think there is any way to 'clone to remote'. You'd have to > ssh to the other machine and clone from there, or you can just create > an empty repository on the remote host and push the stuff into it. I remember

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 12:10

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Bill Lear wrote: >> So, is there a way of using git to upload my code to a machine without a >> repo ready-prepared? > > If you must ... > > % cat ~/.gitconfig > [alias] > scp !scp > rcp !rcp > % git scp -rp . me@remotehost:/directory

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 12:29

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Bill Lear wrote: > Actually that was a bit tongue-in-cheek, syntactically incorrect (I > believe missing '='), I'm not actually sure it will work, nor if the > patch for this actually got in to 1.5.0. The patch I saw does not > appear to pass the

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 12:48

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Matthieu Moy wrote: > Not any. The joke was just "if you insist in having git at the > beginning of the command line, ...". Forgive me, I have a BAAD cold today and many things are going over my head .... :-) That is frustrating, though, that I

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 13:04

Re: Newbie experience with push over ssh

Nicolas Pitre wrote: > What would be the point if you don't have GIT on the remote system? > > Just use rsync or scp to copy your code over and be happy. For one thing, I might be making small changes or have unversioned files in my local

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 14 2007 - 13:47

Configuring gitk appearance

Is there any way to configure the appearance of gitk either during or after installation? At present on my system (Ubuntu 6.10) the font used is almost illegible. I'm guessing it is partly due to gitk using GTK+ v1 instead of v2. On a related note

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 15 2007 - 12:24

Re: Configuring gitk appearance

Vincent Hanquez wrote: > gitk is not using GTK v1 but TCL/TK. > > see your ~/.gitk and just change those option (9 to 13 or 15 will do): > > set mainfont {Helvetica 9} > set textfont {Courier 9} > set uifont {Helvetica 9 bold} Thanks very much

git - Joseph Wakeling - Feb 15 2007 - 13:05

speck-geostationary