Found 86 matching messages (0.041 seconds). Page 1 of 5.
- Re: [PATCH -v3] LSM/SELinux: show LSM mount options in /proc/mounts
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, James Morris wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Eric Paris wrote ... .
Also, you need an ack from a VFS person on this.
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Apr 27 2008 - 19:52
- Re: [patch 09/14] security: dont pass nameidata to security_inode_permission()
... instead of an inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi
> CC: James Morris
> CC: Stephen Smalley ... Casey Schaufler
Acked-by: James Morris
--
...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - May 21 2008 - 18:52
- Re: [PATCH 9/12: eCryptfs] Inode operations
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> James Morris writes:
>
> > On ... it was I was mis-thinking there.
- James
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Nov 4 2005 - 02:29
- Re: AppArmor FAQ
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, ... . And it's still only capable of controlling
access to filesystem objects.
- James
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Apr 18 2007 - 17:14
- Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> --- James Morris wrote:
>
> ... is to merely to provide pathname-based
labeling outside of the kernel.
- James
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Jun 15 2007 - 23:39
- Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, David Howells wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
>
> > > + u32 (* ... SElinux, where we could always
know the semantics, then that would be a different story.
- James
--
James Morris
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Aug 9 2007 - 14:42
- Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, David Howells wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
>
> > David, ... they can
also justify making the interface more generalized and provide the code
for it.
- James
--
James Morris
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Aug 9 2007 - 15:34
- Re: [PATCH 2/7] fallocate() implementation in i386, x86_64 and powerpc
... P. Quigley
Acked-by: James Morris
(Will need to check it's ok again after final merge).
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Jul 12 2007 - 09:15
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer
... this).
But in any case, it looks ok to me.
Acked-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Oct 23 2007 - 19:38
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: Reorder vfs_getxattr to avoid unnecessary calls to the LSM
... -off-by: David P. Quigley
Acked-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Oct 23 2007 - 19:42
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer
... , 2007-10-27 at 08:14 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > ... cycle?
Not as far as I'm aware.
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Oct 31 2007 - 23:56
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: Reorder vfs_getxattr to avoid unnecessary calls to the LSM
... -off-by: David P. Quigley
Acked-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Nov 1 2007 - 16:58
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer
... -off-by: David P. Quigley
Acked-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Nov 1 2007 - 16:58
- Re: [PATCH 05/37] Security: Change current->fs[ug]id to current_fs[ug]id()
... the task_struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
Reviewed-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Feb 11 2008 - 06:38
- Re: [PATCH 06/37] Security: Separate task security context from task_struct
... > offsets.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells
Reviewed-by: James Morris
(SELinux stuff mostly).
--
James Morris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Feb 11 2008 - 06:43
- Re: [PATCH -v3] LSM/SELinux: show LSM mount options in /proc/mounts
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Eric Paris wrote: ... now, and it's
not an obvious and trivial fix.
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Apr 27 2008 - 19:31
- Re: [PATCH]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx.
... , Apr 28, 2008 at 09:33:22AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > Cristoph, Casey -- any chance of getting ... than pushing them to
mainline at this stage.
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Apr 28 2008 - 11:04
- Re: [patch] vfs: make security_inode_setattr() calling consistent
... so common case behaviour
doesn't change with this patch.
Acked-by: James Morris
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Jul 30 2008 - 17:52
- Re: [PATCH -v2] SELinux/LSM: display SELinux mount options in /proc/mounts
... It requires the a6307a583a073f85c38399c1e2c21dfe2d6a3da0
> changeset in jame's repo to compile. I'll let you and James decide if
> we should push it through ... ;
seq_putc(m, '\n');
return err;
--
James Morris
--
To ...
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Apr 8 2008 - 18:36
- Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
... that it needs
underlying VFS support. Multipart messages seem to have survived fine up
until now. Where is the justification?
- James
--
James Morris
linux-fsdevel - James Morris - Aug 26 2004 - 01:17