Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:47, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>Justin C. Sherrill wrote: >> >>>Benchmarking will be useful soon. DragonFly-specific technologies like >> >>How soon is soon? I'm ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 14 2004 - 16:48

Ivan Voras wrote: > I finally got to installing DragonFly, and it went smoothly, but I'm a > little puzzled on how to proceed with installing ports? Should I cvsup > the FreeBSD's ports and then DragonFly's dports? Can someone give me > more ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 19 2004 - 11:00

Brian Reichert wrote: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:44:13PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>Well, It's over at last. The results in a "world readable" format can be >>fetched as http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Apr 5 2004 - 18:08

Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:59:46 +0200 > Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> - one way to do it is to try DHCP and see if the computer gets an IP >>adress, but! ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jul 1 2004 - 07:46

Chris Pressey wrote: > On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 21:22:45 +0200 > Ivan Voras wrote: > > >>This seems a very nice and mature release - I think it's ready for >>1.0. >> >>Some notes (non- ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jul 9 2004 - 05:19

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 12:37:24PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > The reason why subsystems has to be aware of mutexes is the dead lock risk. > You don't want a thread holding a ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Feb 3 2005 - 09:30

... the binary source when I >> browse it in Netscape 6.2. > > > It is an OpenOffice file. I would prefer if Ivan could put up > some souped up PDFs once the whole benchmarking stuff is done. > ;-) Yes I will. The file I posted is ...

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 9 2004 - 06:55

Ryan Dooley wrote: > That's most fair. I would not want to compromised performance and > scalability with the overhead of security up-front. I'll hold that > thought until after a 1.0 release. Speaking of which, when will it be relased? --

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Dec 9 2003 - 14:21

Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > Benchmarking will be useful soon. DragonFly-specific technologies like How soon is soon? I'm thinking of benchmarking FreeBSD 4.9, 5.2, DF, Linux/2.4 & Linux2.6 on a "spare" machine, but it won't be spare for long. (

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 14 2004 - 12:47

Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > I have run bytebench on a machine running FreeBSD 5.2 and > DragonFly (this is old hardware: dual PII @333MHz). I am going to > install FreeBSD 4.9 on a third slice to have another comparison > point. Here are the (

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 16 2004 - 10:19

I was inder the impression that setting CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf only alter the way userland & applications are compiled, but now, looking at a fresh new FreeBSD 5.2, I see that it uses my CFLAGS in compiling at least some of the modules. Was that

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 16 2004 - 11:45

Matthew Dillon wrote: > I kinda prefer the journal idea. As an alternative iet would be possible > to augment the filesystem code to mark individual cylinder groups and > dirty or clean to greatly reduce the amount of work that fsck had

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 19 2004 - 13:26

Aaron Malone wrote: > the ISO). But if you want to start from a FreeBSD base, I did a 4.9 -> > dfly upgrade without any problems, though it was a couple months ago. Via cvsup source?

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 22 2004 - 01:14

Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: > Interesting to note if you plan on doing MFC's from FreeBSD-CURRENT: > > [From: > http://www.thejemreport.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=108] > It really depends (on amd64 support, for

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Jan 23 2004 - 10:05

Some time ago I had a plan to benchmark several OS'es for fun&learning. As it turned out, due to the lack of time the process was very slow. I intend to do DragonFlyBSD next, so I'm asking: what would be the best way to install it? Download the

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 8 2004 - 11:15

Matthew Dillon wrote: > I think DFly is in pretty good shape performance-wise but there is > at least one mbuf related patch we ought to throw in. Also, the > recent token code work has not been well optimized yet but I don't know >

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 8 2004 - 15:32

I finally got to installing DragonFly, and it went smoothly, but I'm a little puzzled on how to proceed with installing ports? Should I cvsup the FreeBSD's ports and then DragonFly's dports? Can someone give me more details on this issue?

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 19 2004 - 10:52

I finally got some time to do DragonFly; the (somewhat suprising) results can be seen here: http://geri.cc.fer.hr/~ivoras/osbench/osbench.sxc It seems that DF could do a lot better but there's something holding it back (especially in the web CMS

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 28 2004 - 09:30

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :It seems that DF could do a lot better but there's something holding it > :back (especially in the web CMS test). I got a lot of 'too many database > :connections' errors, like the db server doesn't get

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Mar 29 2004 - 04:44

Matthew Dillon wrote: > The recent PIPE work adapted from Alan Cox's work in FreeBSD-5 has really > lit a fire under my seat. It's amazing how such a simple concept can I've always wondered: is it the same Alan Cox "of linux"?

dragonflybsd-kernel - Ivan Voras - Apr 4 2004 - 15:20