login
Header Space

 
 

Mailing list archives

Search results

Found 7 matching messages (0.025 seconds). Page 1 of 1.

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

... 19, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > "Edwin Eyan Moragas" wrote: > > > > the question is, which one is more useful when writing new servers? > > kqueue or ...

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Apr 19 2008 - 23:29

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

... Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > > "Edwin Eyan Moragas" wrote: > > > > > the question is, which one is more useful when writing new servers? > > > ...

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Apr 21 2008 - 09:49

poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

Hi all, been reading the select(2) man pages and it mentions poll(2) being more efficient in most cases. this makes it obvious to discard the use of select(2) in writing new servers. i've come across some performance benchmarks which is trying to

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Apr 19 2008 - 01:27

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

thank you, Theo. On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > been reading the select(2) man pages and it mentions poll(2) > > being more efficient in most cases. this makes it obvious to > > discard the use

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Apr 19 2008 - 02:46

Re: poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance

Hi Eric, On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Eric Faurot wrote: > > the question is, which one is more useful when writing new servers? > > kqueue or poll? > > The more useful is event(3). i've been looking also at libevent

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Apr 19 2008 - 04:38

curses web man pages

ey list, i was checking things out her: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ncurses&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html and clicked the link for one of the curs_* man pages. say for example curs_pad(3). it

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Jun 7 2008 - 15:59

Apache theoretical questions (was Re: no thttpd.conf for OpenBSD?)

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Ted Unangst wrote: > For better or worse, the base web server is Apache 1, and that's how > things are going to be. > > Since the subject of apache came up, i was reminded of a thread some

openbsd-misc - Edwin Eyan Moragas - Jun 19 2008 - 23:55

speck-geostationary