Found 10 matching messages (0.001 seconds). Page 1 of 1.
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dave Harrison <dave@cryptohorizon.com> [2007-05-21 08:26]:
>> Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> * Uv Pzaf
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - May 22 2007 - 03:35
... Can anyone say definitively if this is (im)possible ?? And if it is possible, how they managed it ? Cheers Dave ========== debug1: Remote: Failed to open the tunnel device. channel 1: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Jan 26 2008 - 06:42
... and 2.5 seems to be in there. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/lang/python/?only_with_tag=OPENBSD_4_0 But when I do a `cvs checkout -rOPENBSD_4_0 ports` I don't get a 2.5 directory. Am I doing something wrong ?? Cheers Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Feb 20 2007 - 21:16
... in login.conf, but this should be enough anyway. You might find dovecot is not running at the user you think it is (or at least isn't in the class you think it is). As a side note I have noticed that Dovecot can be a bit fd hungry. HTH Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Mar 12 2007 - 05:22
... would be to leave the dovecot class, make sure the _dovecot user is allocated to that class (Nico's post will show you that) and then modify the limits for that class only - modifying the daemon class will affect all processes that come it. Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Mar 12 2007 - 06:29
... as it's only indicative of the traffic you recorded - which is likely to be biased towards whatever was happening at the time on your LAN. When all's said and done, benchmark for the traffic you "expect" and work from there. HTH Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Jun 6 2007 - 07:42
... are still readable. """ The tasks that this user performs are scheduled through cron. Is there a better way for me to be setting up these kinds of tasks so that this warning doesn't get raised ? Or is the warning spurious ? Cheers Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Nov 13 2007 - 20:06
... inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:11e%carp2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc inet 172.16.2.253 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.2.255 Are there any obvious gotchas that I'm missing here ? Any known behaviours that I'm not aware of ?? Cheers Dave
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Dec 20 2007 - 00:31
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - May 21 2007 - 02:16
Matt Rowley wrote: >>> best "simulation" is recording your real-world traffic using tcpdump and >>> then use tcpreplay. but that is tricky too. >> Henning has something in saying that most of the tools aren't great, >> in the end all benchmarks are
openbsd-misc - Dave Harrison - Jun 6 2007 - 08:38