... -05-30 at 15:56 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> static int alloc_device(struct ... memory. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hunter@nokia.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Jun 5 2008 - 03:28

... the amount and granularity of this. >> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> It's everything but convenient :) Please make it one config option to >>> compile in ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 28 2008 - 07:23

Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>>>> But these don't make much sense to me. Why would you want to be able >>>>> to compile out printks at this ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 28 2008 - 08:25

Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:10:07AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>>> So instead of arguing about this you really ought to look at what >>>> SLUB, for example, does. It's ...

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 30 2008 - 03:04

When testing how JFFS2 handles write errors, the following message appears: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/writeback.h:76 Here is the terminal output: # uname -a Linux ahunter-desktop 2.6.20ded11 #13 SMP

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Mar 20 2007 - 06:51

Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Thursday 2008-03-27 15:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> >> here is a new flash file system developed by Nokia engineers with >> help of the University of Szeged. The new file-system is called >> UBIFS, which stands for

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Mar 31 2008 - 08:47

Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Artem, > > Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> Well, I do not see a big reason not to get rid of this harmless stuff. >> Many kernel subsystems have their debugging, why not? Using BUG_ON() is >> OK in few most important places. But

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 1 2008 - 04:34

Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Pekka Enberg wrote: >>> Yeah, this is also a guarding thing. When a dirty page is released >>> the budget which was allocated for it has to be freed. If this function >>> is called, then the budget was not freed, which

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 1 2008 - 11:14

ext Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:51:50AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>> But these don't make much sense to me. Why would you want to be able >>> to compile out printks at this granularity? Why not enable all of them >>>

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 28 2008 - 03:09

ext Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:33:37PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> I don't know how many times I have to say this: you're doing it at the >> wrong level! The reason you want to compile them out is because you've >> added

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - Apr 28 2008 - 03:10

Thanks for the review. Christoph Hellwig wrote: > General comment: > > - not supporting a flash page size different from the system page > size is a horrible thing for people trying to use the same storage > on multiple systems. For a

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - May 16 2008 - 09:10

Jan Kara wrote: > The sequence you write above is actually incorrect I think. Noone > guarantees that the cookie returned by telldir() is valid after > closedir(). What is a bigger (and quite common) problem is, if somebody > uses readdir/telldir/

linux-kernel - Adrian Hunter - May 30 2008 - 06:57