Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Timo Juhani Lindfors <timo.lindfors@...>
Cc: openmoko-kernel <openmoko-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009 - 5:33 am

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Timo Juhani
Lindfors wrote:

Is a prebuilt image+modules available for that revision?
It'd like to see how much it's really stable.
Last week I started a prototype application to control wpa_supplicant
over dbus, and my experiments are going slow because I'm not able to
find a really stable kernel.
As compile/deploy/test phases are frequent and as my tool
enables/disables wifi resource, drives wpa_supplicant, starts/stops
udhcpc at every lauch, after a bit every kernel crashes or wifi
becomes unusable.
I'm using standard AF_INET sockets to read signal quality and it's
broken as in iwconfig, while iwlist eth0 scan reports it correctly and
/proc/* reports always 0 values.
For sure my code is dirty and buggy, but it's only pure userspace, so
I have a buggy hardware phone or a serious care to the wifi driver was
not taken by OM even when it had payed employees. But as the second
seems absurd for me, I'm really thinking I have big hardware issues.

>> Linux debian-gta02 2.6.28-20090105.git69b2aa26 #1 PREEMPT Tue Mar 3

Umh... it may be the debian kernel was packaged from a different branch.

>

I'll try it, is watchdog capable of hard reboot a very broken system?
some times I can log to ssh but "halt -n -f" segs faults, holding the
power menu for 10 seconds printks it but it does not reboot, while
sometimes it simply becomes a brick!.

>

I did not added them as they were revealed on 2.6.28, I prefer try the
patched 2.6.29 first.

Best Regards

Nicola

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Nelson Castillo, (Wed Jul 1, 5:21 pm)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Thu Jul 2, 12:09 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Michael Trimarchi, (Thu Jul 2, 4:51 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Michael Trimarchi, (Thu Jul 2, 8:12 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Werner Almesberger, (Thu Jul 2, 8:38 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Thu Jul 2, 2:16 pm)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Werner Almesberger, (Sat Jul 4, 10:08 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 7:14 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Tue Aug 4, 8:23 am)
[RFC 4/4] AR6000 BUG FIX on live lock, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 8:52 am)
[RFC 3/4] AR6000 rework, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 8:51 am)
Re: [RFC 3/4] AR6000 rework, Werner Almesberger, (Tue Aug 4, 10:43 am)
Re: [RFC 3/4] AR6000 rework, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 11:04 am)
[RFC 2/4] AR6000 patches , Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 8:49 am)
Re: [RFC 2/4] AR6000 patches, Werner Almesberger, (Tue Aug 4, 10:34 am)
Re: [RFC 2/4] AR6000 patches, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 11:06 am)
Re: [RFC 2/4] AR6000 patches, Michael Trimarchi, (Tue Aug 4, 11:03 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Michael Trimarchi, (Thu Jul 2, 12:04 pm)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Thu Jul 2, 4:51 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Nicola Mfb, (Fri Jul 3, 5:33 am)
Re: RFC: Possible fix for wireless issue / Power consumption?, Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Fri Jul 3, 6:00 am)