Home » Mailing list archives » openmoko-community » 2010 » July » 31

Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Subject: Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard
Date: Friday, July 30, 2010 - 5:02 pm

On 26/07/2010 - 10.58 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:

Using this kernel [1] the WSODs stopped (I'm using this SHR unstable
running from a µSD card)... However with it I can't use my wifi device.
It isn't found at all by the phone!

[1] http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/glamo/242/shrkernel_nows/



_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvements ..., Gennady Kupava, (Sat Jul 17, 1:42 pm)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Sat Jul 17, 3:13 pm)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., David Garabana Barro, (Sun Jul 18, 3:16 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Timo Jyrinki, (Sun Jul 18, 4:51 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Petr Vanek, (Sun Jul 18, 8:54 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., David Garabana Barro, (Sun Jul 18, 9:17 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., David Garabana Barro, (Sun Jul 18, 10:56 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Tha_Man, (Sun Jul 18, 11:15 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., David Garabana Barro, (Sun Jul 18, 12:01 pm)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Petr Vanek, (Mon Jul 19, 12:04 pm)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Christian =?iso-8859 ..., (Mon Jul 19, 11:59 pm)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., ghislain, (Tue Jul 20, 12:17 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Petr Vanek, (Tue Jul 20, 12:36 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Sebastian Krzyszkowiak, (Tue Jul 20, 3:11 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., ghislain, (Tue Jul 20, 5:23 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Thomas HOCEDEZ, (Tue Jul 20, 5:37 am)
Flashing qi broke my freerunner, Helge Hafting, (Tue Jul 20, 7:52 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Radek Polak, (Tue Jul 20, 9:37 am)
Re: Glamo slowness question. Glamo transfer speed improvem ..., Timo Juhani Lindfors, (Tue Jul 20, 11:29 am)
Re: Flashing qi broke my freerunner, Lars Hennig, (Tue Jul 20, 12:15 pm)
Re: Flashing qi broke my freerunner, pearn, (Tue Jul 20, 11:24 pm)
Re: Flashing qi broke my freerunner - SOLVED, Helge Hafting, (Wed Jul 21, 1:11 am)
Re: Flashing qi broke my freerunner - SOLVED, Petr Vanek, (Wed Jul 21, 1:25 am)
My guess about the WSOD, Helge Hafting, (Fri Jul 23, 1:21 am)
Re: My guess about the WSOD, Christian =?iso-8859 ..., (Fri Jul 23, 2:06 am)
2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Helge Hafting, (Mon Jul 26, 1:58 am)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Xavier Cremaschi, (Mon Jul 26, 2:15 am)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Fox Mulder, (Mon Jul 26, 2:50 am)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Christian =?iso-8859 ..., (Mon Jul 26, 3:07 am)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Marco Trevisan (Treviño), (Fri Jul 30, 5:02 pm)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sat Jul 31, 12:40 am)
Re: 2+4+2 timing seemed to disrupt access to the sdcard, Marco Trevisan (Treviño), (Sat Jul 31, 2:01 am)