RE: In the press

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: List for Openmoko community discussion <community@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 9:31 am

I think it's fair to say most open source projects evolve this way. The
wiki isn't that bad, and if you want to develop starting from any sort
of open and active code base you have to expect a learning curve and
documentation that's not going to be exactly up to date.

Keep in mind too that following the sort of massive changes prior to a
release it takes a while for the documentation to catch up.

-----Original Message-----
From: community-bounces@lists.openmoko.org
[mailto:community-bounces@lists.openmoko.org] On Behalf Of Scott Derrick
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:15 AM
To: sean@openmoko.com; List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: In the press

Man I have to agree. I'm just jumping on to the OM bandwagon with the
purchase of two freerunners but have reservations about it now.

Looking through the Wiki is a pain and a chore to find useful data. Yes
there are gems in there but they are buried under tons of old and
inaccurate data.

Some people having very basic problems, like making a phone call, or
playing music, charging the phone, right out of the box is really
inexcusable. And for many this list is the only source of "possible"
solutions!

If the OM is going to survive and grow into a viable platform something
has to change. Somebody is going to have to take the reins on
documentation. Information is the key to its success and right now its
in shambles. I'm not trying to point a finger or blame anybody. I think

the scope has grown beyond the ad-hoc means used up to now, especially
since we have a new phone added to the mix. There has to be some
distinction between the 1973 and the FR because it appears they are not
completely compatible.

I think OM is going to have to step up to the plate and dedicate some
resources to at least organizing/overseeing and enforcing a standard to

the documentation of the project so there is coherence, timeliness
and to reduce the outdated and inaccurate information.

Scott

Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:

>> for people who /should/ be updating the wiki to feel like its

>> of IRC, of the codebase, of code delta's, etc.

it

> make us all very grateful.

could

--

-
"Just because I sound like an idiot doesn't mean I agree with the
president."....from an ad on Air America Radio

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
In the press, Matt Joyce, (Fri Jul 11, 12:41 am)
Re: In the press, BrendaWang, (Wed Jul 16, 3:23 am)
Re: In the press, Jay Vaughan, (Fri Jul 11, 4:26 am)
Re: In the press, BrendaWang, (Wed Jul 16, 3:46 am)
Re: In the press, Sean Moss-Pultz, (Tue Jul 15, 12:47 am)
Re: In the press, Scott Derrick, (Tue Jul 15, 9:14 am)
RE: In the press, Crane, Matthew, (Tue Jul 15, 9:31 am)
Re: In the press, Jay Vaughan, (Tue Jul 15, 6:06 am)
Re: In the press, Ken Restivo, (Tue Jul 15, 7:10 am)
Re: In the press, Matt Joyce, (Tue Jul 15, 3:28 am)
Re: In the press, Shawn Thompson, (Tue Jul 15, 6:38 am)
Re: In the press, matt joyce, (Fri Jul 11, 6:33 am)
Re: In the press, BrendaWang, (Wed Jul 16, 3:58 am)
Re: In the press, Vinc Duran, (Fri Jul 11, 1:14 am)
Re: In the press, Scott Derrick, (Fri Jul 11, 8:06 am)
Re: In the press, BrendaWang, (Wed Jul 16, 4:25 am)
Re: In the press, David Samblas Martinez, (Wed Jul 16, 6:04 am)
Re: In the press, Torfinn Ingolfsen, (Fri Jul 11, 9:07 am)
Re: In the press, Shawn Thompson, (Fri Jul 11, 1:57 am)