On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:06:07PM +0200, Jay Vaughan wrote:
This kind of "fork" in the documentation and community is pretty typical in the case of a commercial product that isn't necessarily friendly to hackers. So there's an unofficial fan page where enthusiasts can discuss undocumented/unsupported features, odd uses, hacks, cracks, complain about the manufacturer, diss the users of competing products, and the like. The fan site is owned by the user commmunity and is somewhat isolated from being censored or easily closed down by the manufacturer.
In the Free/Open software world, it's usually very different. It's more typical for that user community to be an integral part of the project itself. There is a much blurrier line between users and developers, and that's pretty much the whole point.
Again, I'll point to the OpenWRT Wiki (and forums, and IRC channel, bug tracker, and mailing list) as a great example of what I consider to be excellent documentation and support for a free project.
-ken
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Kamalesh Babulal | [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Kernel Ooops while running dbench |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Steven Rostedt | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
