RE: MokSec - The Security Framework

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: List for Openmoko community discussion <community@...>
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008 - 10:57 am

I would think on a phone the primary concern is protecting the user
data.

E.g. sms, contacts, history.

If somebody was able to malicously install software on the phone, your
pretty much already $%@#'ed. Not letting it call out helps, but it's
already defeated. I'm assuming we're not installing a lot of new
unknowns on a secure device, and anything trying to make network
connections is evol.

I've been picturing running an encrypted rootfs image off an SD card.
There could be multiple encrypted rootfs images, only one would be the
real one, or they all could be used for different reasons.

Once the system boots it's up to the user to unlock the keys to the
encrypted image to be used and that gets booted from the already running
kernel.

-----Original Message-----
From: community-bounces@lists.openmoko.org
[mailto:community-bounces@lists.openmoko.org] On Behalf Of Tilman
Baumann
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:38 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: MokSec - The Security Framework

Kalle Happonen wrote:

> However, later on an easily configurable firewall would be almost

should

> is that users can do what they want, it doesn't mean that the apps
they

viable

SELinux comes to mind. Or at least the capabilites framework.
This way i could choose to allow a app to open sockets. (Little bit like

java sandboxes)
As far as i know we could even have a popup asking for permission.

And to give my 2 Eurocents to the everything as root discusion.
Running user apps as root must end, better soon.
If apps need things only root can do (not much comes to my mind) we
could use sudo wrapper or SELinux rules.

--
Drucken Sie diese Mail bitte nur auf Recyclingpapier aus.
Please print this mail only on recycled paper.

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
MokSec - The Security Framework, Yorick Moko, (Sun Jul 13, 8:07 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Kalle Happonen, (Mon Jul 14, 3:20 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Jay Vaughan, (Mon Jul 14, 10:16 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, thomasg, (Mon Jul 14, 4:03 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Kalle Happonen, (Mon Jul 14, 9:35 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, thomasg, (Mon Jul 14, 11:16 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Kalle Happonen, (Mon Jul 14, 12:19 pm)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Tilman Baumann, (Mon Jul 14, 10:38 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, arne anka, (Mon Jul 14, 11:08 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, thomasg, (Mon Jul 14, 11:19 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, arne anka, (Mon Jul 14, 11:22 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, thomasg, (Mon Jul 14, 11:27 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Kalle Happonen, (Mon Jul 14, 12:13 pm)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, thomasg, (Mon Jul 14, 12:18 pm)
RE: MokSec - The Security Framework, Crane, Matthew, (Mon Jul 14, 12:46 pm)
RE: MokSec - The Security Framework, Crane, Matthew, (Mon Jul 14, 10:57 am)
RE: MokSec - The Security Framework, Knight Walker, (Tue Aug 19, 2:58 pm)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Robert Schuster, (Sun Jul 13, 9:00 am)
Re: MokSec - The Security Framework, Bumbl, (Sun Jul 13, 8:38 am)