Re: My experience with the Freerunner

Previous thread: none

Next thread: Re: Barometric altimeter on 'future' Freerunner ? by Heikki on Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 11:15 pm. (1 message)
From: ian douglas
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 10:39 am

Taking Lasse's advice, I set up a new test last night:

I fully charged my Freerunner, inserted the TMobile SIM card, and set it 
beside my computer speakers with Amarok looping some of my more rockin' 
tunes. I made sure the only thing left 'on' on the Freerunner was the 
GSM modem (wifi which is on by default, was turned off). I also enabled 
power-saving (dim, no lock -- but it locks anyway)

I called it from my AT&T phone, which I plugged in next to my TV and 
watched two full movies from Netflix and 3 episodes of The Dead Zone.

In that span, where both phones would have audio to play back and forth 
to one another, my AT&T phone beeped after 3 hours, 51 minutes and 11 
seconds that the connection was broken. I immediately redialed the 
Freerunner, and since it was already at about 90 minutes into the second 
call, I went to bed.

I got up this morning to see that my AT&T phone ended the call after 2 
hours, 11 minutes and 21 seconds. I figured this went one of two ways -- 
the Freerunner ran out of battery power, or I ran out of minutes from 
TMobile.

My TMobile SIM card was a 1,000-minute pay-as-you-go SIM, which is about 
16.7 hours of talk time, which I've only ever used for my Freerunner 
tests ... so having only three 3:51:00 phone calls (give or take a few 
minutes) and one 2:11:21 call that I still have plenty of minutes left 
on my SIM card, and sure enough -- the battery on the Freerunner was 
completely dead.

(as a side note, it's nice to see that a deeply discharged Freerunner 
doesn't have the same issue as the GTA01 where you have to charge it for 
an hour before anything shows on the screen)

Since I have TMobile minutes left, I'll finally get around to testing 
the phone from various alternate locations this coming weekend with the 
TMobile SIM, and I'll swap it out for the AT&T SIM if needed.

To recap:
- GSM turned on
- wifi turned off
- bluetooth turned off
- gps turned off
- power saving enabled (dim, no lock)
- total talk time of ...
From: Andy Green
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 11:21 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Lasse Poulsen wrote:
|> Also it would be nice to see how long call time you have if you talk
|> continually (might i suggest an audio-book or to). If you don't i
|> properly will (haven't got the device yet!)
|
|
| Taking Lasse's advice, I set up a new test last night:

Just a little point about these tests, AIUI the GPS stuff acts radically
differently in terms of current consumption depending on the distance
from the base station.  All we can reasonably do is compare same-tester
results for their different phones from the same physical location.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkg+9EcACgkQOjLpvpq7dMpslACdH6bGOPNwScfU0UgjoiR/kUDh
bgAAn2Vtt/O8ZhkgpiT8X6g3iEgEhwSa
=ctuM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: Joerg Reisenweber
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 12:51 pm

--nextPart2119080.LrHIYZA5pc
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline


Yep! exactly, due to tx-power calibration, cell-handover etc.=20

/jOERG

--nextPart2119080.LrHIYZA5pc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIPwlZ7Xtwhpk1UgwRAmTHAJ9Kyy+4LT6ZH0tjxO5hNQ8rZYhazQCgqDX9
R1Ax7B/zkZOYg4BaMBaGsUA=
=RBqG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2119080.LrHIYZA5pc--

From: Andy Green
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008 - 2:23 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Am Do  29. Mai 2008 schrieb Andy Green:
|> Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> | Lasse Poulsen wrote:
|> |> Also it would be nice to see how long call time you have if you talk
|> |> continually (might i suggest an audio-book or to). If you don't i
|> |> properly will (haven't got the device yet!)
|> |
|> |
|> | Taking Lasse's advice, I set up a new test last night:
|>
|> Just a little point about these tests, AIUI the GPS stuff acts radically
| s/GPS/GSM/ ;)

Yeah.

What it means is you can compare two tests done at the same location,
but we can expect different results from the same phone when the test is
done in another location.

So A-B testing Freerunner against "Brand X" phone at the same location
is a valid test and we can directly compare the results.  But probably
we will see mails from one guy saying his Freerunner with GSM on lasted
n hours, another guy is n+2 hours, etc, instead of variation in
Freerunner it can mean variation in the amount of effort the RF section
has to do to talk in the two locations.

- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkg/x5kACgkQOjLpvpq7dModwgCggcAgO2OzZJGsDWXJhkSuh5NO
PIMAn1DliiSGFdWzXxh3f8jqN+GxmNwF
=+5X6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: ian douglas
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 12:58 pm

I'm assuming you meant "GSM" not "GPS", so as I understand your point, a 
better test would be actually having the Neo move around geographically 
to hop to/from different cell towers, and that a test like this will 
give more realistic battery usage statistics?

In theory, it sounds very reasonable if it will draw varying amount of 
current from the battery. Thanks for the idea.

Given the cost of gasoline these days, though much lower than in Europe, 
I'm not sure spending two tanks of gas to drive around for 4-6 hours to 
achieve more usage stats will be feasible.

I think that knowing a "best case scenario" (where you stay in the same 
location), you get about 6 hours of talk time, is still helpful. Cell 
phone manufacturers typically report a "best case scenario" when 
reporting talk time and standby time, with the legalese and fine print 
stating that "your results may vary" from their data.

Thoughts?

-id

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: Joerg Reisenweber
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 2:35 pm

--nextPart4701789.JQMipLnpyf
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline


I think *not* moving for all tests (and different types of cellphones to=20
compare) is near a "best case" scenario for standby time - anyway place som=
e=20
sensitive radio or the like near the phone, to hear the typical interferenc=
e=20
noise when it is sending, just to make sure you don't sit on a "bad spot"=20
where the phone changes cell every few minutes.

=46or "best case" talktime scenarios the distance to basestation is much mo=
re=20
important. Here you should check for *very* good RF-signal, means very near=
=20
to BS and thus allowing the phone-transmitter to power down to lowest level.

Also note that GSM without simcard is constantly reselecting cells, so ener=
gy=20
consumption is really bad. Switch off GSM when not registering to a network.
/jOERG

--nextPart4701789.JQMipLnpyf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIPyGc7Xtwhpk1UgwRAm/YAJ49EB9QLz4I0rCEIv5YRBLaXfsKKACgqYFF
sGEDOqPHHftCcSz+oW42QQk=
=MAyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4701789.JQMipLnpyf--

From: "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 3:23 pm

I agree, and we can't ask you more than testing like you're doing.

Unfortunately I don't live always in places where's there's full GSM 
signal strength (there are mountains, here! :P), so I already thought to 
this issue, but I didn't hope in test in this scenario...

The only thing I'm asking to you, Ian, is to report the GSM signal 
strength in your testing zone, just to complete the informations you've 
already given.

Anyway, I'll appreciate so much if another one of the lucky Freerunner 
owners could make a battery test (also just a "standby" one) in a place 
with low GSM coverage...

Thanks again!

-- 
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/


_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: ian douglas
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 4:23 pm

Thanks for your thoughts, Marco.



As of today I have 165 minutes remaining of my 1,000 minute TMobile SIM 
card, so I'll have to restock it to do any more tests. I think TMobile 
still has their "1000-minutes for $100" special going on, so I'll stock 

Fair enough. I'll report on that when I get home as my office building 
is probably more shielded than my apartment. I live near the beach, no 
mountains to really speak of, and my AT&T phone, which was always 
showing EDGE connectivity at my old apartment always shows 
full-bandwidth "3G" at the new apartment, which is partly why I wanted 

As soon as my Freerunner is back to full-charge, I'll try to emulate 
Einstein's standby tests with all 4 components (GSM, WiFi, Bluetooth, 
GPS) turned on, then off, and report my own findings. I'll try to do it 
with both SIM cards, if that makes any difference, and without any SIM 
at all -- I'm curious if having no SIM card will emulate "low GSM 
coverage" with the phone trying to constantly register on a network.

Since I have 5,000 evening/weekend minutes with AT&T, once I fill up my 
TMobile card again, I'll take my Freerunner and Blackjack 2 on errands 
this weekend, see if I can spend more than 6 hours connecting the two 
phones again in varying locations around Los Angeles.

If anyone else has suggestions on how to test battery life, I'd love to 
hear them. Especially from Michael and Steve, as they can probably 
direct us a little better on what kinds of real-life scenario testing 
they'd like us to help in.

I'm going to see if I can write a CPU-intensive script to run on the 
Freerunner too, see if I can time how long the battery will last with 
the CPU running 100% ... again, just a curiosity.

-id


_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: Bastian Muck
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008 - 6:18 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
ian douglas schrieb:
| Thanks for your thoughts, Marco.
|
|
| Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
|> I agree, and we can't ask you more than testing like you're doing.
|
| As of today I have 165 minutes remaining of my 1,000 minute TMobile 
SIM card, so I'll have to restock it to do any more tests. I think 
TMobile still has their "1000-minutes for $100" special going on, so 
I'll stock up later this evening.
Wow, phoning is really expensive at your location. When you do some more 
tests it might be cheaper to make holidays in e.g. germany. I pay 30 € / 
month and can call  T-Mobile and  landline as much as I want to. If I 
had a Freerunner then I would support you.  But there is a little 
problem with this. :-(
|
|> The only thing I'm asking to you, Ian, is to report the GSM signal 
strength in your testing zone, just to complete the informations you've 
already given.
|
| Fair enough. I'll report on that when I get home as my office building 
is probably more shielded than my apartment. I live near the beach, no 
mountains to really speak of, and my AT&T phone, which was always 
showing EDGE connectivity at my old apartment always shows 
full-bandwidth "3G" at the new apartment, which is partly why I wanted 
to do some testing around my old apartment.
|
|> Anyway, I'll appreciate so much if another one of the lucky 
Freerunner owners could make a battery test (also just a "standby" one) 
in a place with low GSM coverage...
|
| As soon as my Freerunner is back to full-charge, I'll try to emulate 
Einstein's standby tests with all 4 components (GSM, WiFi, Bluetooth, 
GPS) turned on, then off, and report my own findings. I'll try to do it 
with both SIM cards, if that makes any difference, and without any SIM 
at all -- I'm curious if having no SIM card will emulate "low GSM 
coverage" with the phone trying to constantly register on a network.
|
| Since I have 5,000 evening/weekend minutes with AT&T, once I fill up 
my ...
From: ian douglas
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008 - 9:22 am

If I paid for a monthly voice/data plan with TMobile, I'm sure I'd have 
more minutes to spare. With my AT&T plan, I pay $39.99 and have 450 
daytime minutes and 5000 evening and weekend minutes per month, which is 
more than enough for my wife and I to use.

-id

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: Joerg Reisenweber
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 4:51 pm

--nextPart2685387.cQfh7QEVsU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline


Standby doesn't vary with signal-strength. Just receiver is active (except=
=20
T3210 every few hours), so it should be no difference.
Talktime goes down with distance^2.5 I guess.=20
/j

--nextPart2685387.cQfh7QEVsU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIP0Gf7Xtwhpk1UgwRAkABAJ0f2VCQ9IxCKQjQsEy4fmXKVilsZwCgsG6v
azwed/MhuD6VZM4igMYgIAc=
=OskF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2685387.cQfh7QEVsU--

From: "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 6:20 pm

Ah... Thanks for the info. I thought this since my actual mobile battery 
really dies so slowly when I'm on places where there's good GSM 
coverage. But maybe it's due to something else!

-- 
Treviño's World - Life and Linux
http://www.3v1n0.net/


_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: AVee
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 3:02 pm

This test might not even be 'best case'. A better test would be having the Neo 
really close to the cell tower for optimal conditions. I guess the difference 
between testing far away from the cell tower and testing close to the tower 
might be pretty big. There probably also is a difference between GSM900 and 
GSM1800 (iirc 1800 has a lower range which needs to be compensated by higher 
transmission power).

AVee

-- 
When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute.
But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute -- and it's longer than any hour.
That's relativity.
  -- Albert Einstein

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

From: Joerg Reisenweber
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 4:30 pm

--nextPart5538459.InJrqTPiJD
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

e=20

Nope, 1800 has half the max output, which is compensated by closer grid of =
BS.
Anyway I guess for "best case" it's no difference.
/j

--nextPart5538459.InJrqTPiJD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIPzyc7Xtwhpk1UgwRAnVPAJ4sWUu6i1c3VznvIhqqs8NkQXQ41gCePqt0
6IJKoPtRKL6xJJlh0/2GlWY=
=cpZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n