Re: SyncML on Freerunner

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Witzany
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 12:18 pm

Jens Meyer schrieb:
funambol is affero gpl ( www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/a*gpl*-3.0.html 
), which just means you have to provide the sourcecode if you offer a 
service based on it (which is fine with me).

And yes it would make more sense to build a service eco system around 
funambol than reinvent the wheel.

Christoph

_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SyncML on Freerunner, linux4u@bluewin.ch, (Mon May 26, 3:51 pm)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Samuel Melrose, (Tue May 27, 1:02 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, David Samblas Martinez, (Tue May 27, 3:31 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Michael Kluge, (Tue May 27, 3:49 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Eildert Groeneveld, (Tue May 27, 5:48 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Torfinn Ingolfsen, (Tue May 27, 8:09 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Vinc Duran, (Tue May 27, 8:42 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Jens Meyer, (Tue May 27, 10:57 am)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Christoph Witzany, (Tue May 27, 12:12 pm)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Christoph Witzany, (Tue May 27, 12:18 pm)
Re: SyncML on Freerunner, Samuel Melrose, (Tue May 27, 3:15 pm)
Ordering Free-for-all?, John Gorkos, (Fri Jun 20, 6:03 pm)
Re: Ordering Free-for-all?, arne anka, (Sat Jun 21, 1:26 am)
Re: Ordering Free-for-all?, Steven **, (Mon Jun 23, 8:54 am)