Re: Switch from GTK to QT (was: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: List for Openmoko community discussion <community@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 9:22 am

------=_Part_10710_16589829.1211376158423
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo E. Prelz wrote:

>

written in C++ or Qt for the simple reason that you can't tinker with the
code. I am sure this is not the case. You use the applications written in
C++/Qt and play with those written in the languages you're comfortable with
or you write your own from scratch. Right now OM needs more new apps than it
needs shipped apps taken apart (which will probably be done by a number of
people anyway).

Refusing to get the phone because you dislike the languages the shipped apps
are written in, not because it prevents anyone from coding in the languages
they prefer or that any of the applications are proprietary is beyond
ridiculous. To each their own though. Good luck getting that perfect phone
that ships with C and GTK apps and also lets you code in any language you
want.

------=_Part_10710_16589829.1211376158423
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo E. Prelz <fluido@fluido.as> wrote:

    

My complaint is that it would be difficult for me to put my hands into

the default apps. They are C++, QT, and expectedly using enough of

those creepy C++-isms (possibly, even those yecchy templates or

whereabouts). I would be comfortable with tinkering with C&GTK main

apps. On the other hand, I would find C++&QT main apps closed boxes (I

perfectly know that I could very well write C/Ruby new code on the

OM).


From this statement, one would think that you don't use _any_ applications written in C++ or Qt for the simple reason that you can't tinker with the code. I am sure this is not the case. You use the applications written in C++/Qt and play with those written in the languages you're comfortable with or you write your own from scratch. Right now OM needs more new apps than it needs shipped apps taken apart (which will probably be done by a number of people anyway).


Refusing to get the phone because you dislike the languages the shipped apps are written in, not because it prevents anyone from coding in the languages they prefer or that any of the applications are proprietary is beyond ridiculous. To each their own though. Good luck getting that perfect phone that ships with C and GTK apps and also lets you code in any language you want.

------=_Part_10710_16589829.1211376158423--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[openmoko-announce] Let us impact the material world, Sean Moss-Pultz, (Fri Jun 27, 12:56 am)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Ian Darwin, (Mon May 19, 12:16 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Gora Mohanty, (Tue Jul 1, 9:40 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Nelson Castillo, (Fri Jun 27, 6:40 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Paul Wouters, (Fri Jun 27, 7:13 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Lally Singh, (Sat Jun 28, 6:51 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Nelson Castillo, (Sat Jun 28, 1:24 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Knight Walker, (Wed Jul 2, 2:09 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Yogiz, (Sun Jun 29, 5:20 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Francesco Cat, (Sat Jun 28, 4:34 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, arne anka, (Sun Jun 29, 11:47 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Francesco Cat, (Sun Jun 29, 12:04 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, arne anka, (Sun Jun 29, 12:12 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, xiangfu, (Sat Jun 28, 8:54 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Knight Walker, (Wed Jul 2, 2:10 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, kenneth marken, (Sat Jun 28, 9:12 am)
Re: Let us impact the material world, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)"..., (Sat Jun 28, 1:03 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, kenneth marken, (Fri Jun 27, 7:02 pm)
Re: Let us impact the material world, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen..., (Fri Jun 27, 5:53 pm)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Carlo E. Prelz, (Mon May 19, 12:49 pm)
RE: Let us impact the material world, Richard Reichenbacher, (Fri Jun 27, 3:24 am)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Travis Tabbal, (Mon May 19, 1:10 pm)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Carlo E. Prelz, (Tue May 20, 2:39 am)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Clinton Ebadi, (Tue May 20, 1:27 pm)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Travis Tabbal, (Tue May 20, 10:21 am)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Vincent, (Tue May 20, 12:32 pm)
Re: Switch from GTK to QT (was: ASU software - pre-pre-relea..., Nkoli, (Wed May 21, 9:22 am)
RE: Switch from GTK to QT (was: ASU software - pre-pre-rele..., Sander van Grieken, (Wed May 21, 4:12 am)
Re: Switch from GTK to QT (was: ASU software - pre-pre-relea..., Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen..., (Tue May 20, 3:45 pm)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Ben Burdette, (Tue May 20, 11:55 am)
Re: ASU software - pre-pre-release impressions, Chris Wright, (Tue May 20, 11:29 am)