------=_Part_2239_8058525.1211293266223

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Carlo E. Prelz  wrote:
> The switch to QT

quoted text
> *requires* the abandoning of C in favour of C++, a language that I

> personally find unsuitable for use.

QT is C++, but you can write your code in C and just use the various classes

to get GUI widgets. I really don't see why someone that knows C would have a

problem with C++. I find some aspects of C++ irritating compared to Java,

C#, Python, etc.. But it's far from "unsuitable for use". I can write both

good and bad code in most any language. And there is nothing saying you have

to write your apps in C++. Whatever, it's your money and your time, do what

you want with it. I just find it an odd thing to be so irritated about.
------=_Part_2239_8058525.1211293266223

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Carlo E. Prelz <fluido@fluido.as> wrote:



 The switch to QT


*requires* the abandoning of C in favour of C++, a language that I


personally find unsuitable for use.



QT is C++, but you can write your code in C and just use the various classes to get GUI widgets. I really don't see why someone that knows C would have a problem with C++. I find some aspects of C++ irritating compared to Java, C#, Python, etc.. But it's far from "unsuitable for use". I can write both good and bad code in most any language. And there is nothing saying you have to write your apps in C++. Whatever, it's your money and your time, do what you want with it. I just find it an odd thing to be so irritated about. 

------=_Part_2239_8058525.1211293266223--