Didier Raboud wrote:
> Marcus Bauer wrote:
Just to be a little more precise:
* This is not a judgment of quality of the given distribution.
* I dislike the fact that the community (companies and individuals) forces
are going in N directions, with N growing.
* I don't think that multiplying the _distributions_ is doing any good to
the OpenMoko ecosystem as whole.
* What seems to lack is not _the perfect packaging scheme_ nor _the good
assembly of softwares_. It's "rock-solid basis functionality".
--
Swisslinux.org − Le carrefour GNU/Linux en Suisse −
http://www.swisslinux.org
_______________________________________________
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: Multicast packet loss |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
