Sean, Roland, I looked through Sean's latest comments. Yes, they are fairly easy to fix and I will fix them. The only one that might need some debate is the one associated with module parameters. In previous communications with Roland I got the impression that he wants to keep them (module parameters) at a minimum. So, how do we address that now? Last time around (after Sean's comments) I just addressed the bugs and skipped the rest since I had no idea as to how much time I had for the merge. These days I do not have exclusive access to the machines with IB adapters limiting the work I can do at a stretch. How much time do I have before this gets merged into the 2.6.24 tree? Other than the module parameters one I should be able to address the rest either by this evening (west coast US) or maybe in the morning/afternoon tomorrow. Will that be acceptable? Pradeep _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Luciano Rocha | usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
