Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christian Weisgerber
Date: Sunday, September 5, 2010 - 9:49 am

Mike Belopuhov <mkb@crypt.org.ru> wrote:


I don't understand that rationale.

A side effect of this is that you now get different key sizes if
you specify "aes-gcm" in a manual SA (128) or an IKE rule (256).

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Aug 30, 1:27 pm)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Christian Weisgerber, (Sun Sep 5, 9:49 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Sun Sep 5, 10:28 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Sep 6, 7:50 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Wed Sep 8, 10:29 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Thu Sep 9, 3:30 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 3: isakmpd, Mike Belopuhov, (Thu Sep 9, 4:08 am)