On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
quoted text
> Rod Whitworth [glisten@witworx.com] wrote:
> > I'm looking after a bgpd setup which announces an IPv6 /32 and an IPv4
> > /21.
> > 
> > Due to a need for some heavy traffic clients to have their traffic
> > arrive via just one transit I'd like to turn that /21 into a /22 and
> > two /23s and only advertise one of the /23s via the "heavy traffic"
> > transit.
> > 
> 
> Here's an example that might work.  You can twist it around depending on how localpref is setup with your providers to make it work better.  If you happen to also be using "network inet static" (redistribute static routes via BGP) and you happen to be statically routing these same subnets beyond your router, you will run into this bug: http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=6406
> 

Are you sure that problem still exists in 4.8 or -current? Because the way
networks are handled changed completely. There is no longer a special
static/connected global rule. Now explicit rules have a higher precedence
then the dynamic "network inet ..." ones.

-- 
:wq Claudio