On 2010/08/25 11:57, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
> Jakob Schlyter <jakob@openbsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > 
> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial
> > searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my
> > googling skills suck). Are these being considered?
> > 
> > The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name
> > server. Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention
> > of retrofitting that.
> > 
> > 	jakob
> > 
> There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature

mature - eh? they keep rewriting it...
here's the latest incarnation:

http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/GettingStartedBIND10Development