Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Kettenis
Date: Monday, August 23, 2010 - 2:35 pm

> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:09:03 +0200

Ah, that's a good find.  I had been looking at LOCAL_ALIGNMENT before,
but wasn't sure that was the way to go.

I'm testing the diff from that bug report now on sparc64 and an
equivalent diff on hppa.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Mike Belopuhov, (Fri Aug 20, 11:58 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Mike Belopuhov, (Fri Aug 20, 6:31 pm)
Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Christian Weisgerber, (Sun Aug 22, 12:40 pm)
Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Mike Belopuhov, (Mon Aug 23, 5:09 am)
Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Mark Kettenis, (Mon Aug 23, 2:35 pm)
Re: AES-GCM Part 1: AES-GCM implementation, Mike Belopuhov, (Thu Sep 2, 7:12 am)